On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 09:25:11PM -0500, Marc Alaia wrote:
|
| I think that an unreasonably-high priority is being put on terminating the
| message before full receipt. The cost-factor may be high now, but once SPF
| is more prevalent spammers will not send non-SPF-compliant emails knowing
| that they will be simply deleted by the receiving system and therefore doing
| it this way will eventually be worthless. I'd rather we do it right in the
| beginning than having less perfect system because one group of users sees it
| more economically right now....
|
This could be true. What do people think will happen? Any spammers on
the list please speak up, your input is important. :)
But processing headers is costly. And I don't know if worms and viruses
will care.
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.4.txt
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡