On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 11:17:49PM -0500, Meng Weng Wong wrote:
Message content outside the signed area should be discarded by the
receiving MTA.
Wouldn't it be sufficient to just sign a Message-ID/From combo, to reduce
overhead? We're only interested in verifying sender identity here, not
entire messages.
Comments welcome. Regrettably, I haven't auto-signed my mail with PGP
in a while. (I had to stop when my mother complained that Outlook
Express kept putting "all these weird attachments" on her desktop.)
I'm still looking for a mutt/KMail plugin/configuration that allows me to
enable it by default yet disable it for specific recipients. I'll keep in
mind that you're basically looking for the same (except maybe for a
different client).
Rob
--
Rob Kaper | Fate fell short this time, your smile fades in the summer
cap(_at_)capsi(_dot_)com | Place your hand in mine, I'll leave when I wanna
www.capsi.com | -- "Feeling This", Blink 182
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.4.txt
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)½§Åv¼ð¦¾Øß´ë ù1Ií-»Fqx(_dot_)com
pgpelO8rfARKp.pgp
Description: PGP signature