At 09:29 AM 1/8/2004, you wrote:
Is trusted-forwarder.org for all to use? Is there an example using such
exemptions?
Yes, how should one use this list? I'm only logging right now, but I just
noticed that one of the messages that triggered an SPF failure was from my
mother's AOL account by way of my pobox.com address!
We're logging based on Mail::SPF::Query, trying result() first, then
best_guess() if that returns "unknown". The problem appears to be that
result() never checks trusted-forwarder.org, and best_guess() never returns
"fail".
It seems to me that an in-between method - one which will check
trusted-forwarder.org if the explicit SPF check returns "fail", but will
not make any other assumptions - would be useful.
Or is the intention to indicate who the *publishers* trust (i.e. have
exists:something.trusted-forwarder.org appear in SPF records), rather than
who the *recipients* trust?
Kelson Vibber
SpeedGate Communications <www.speed.net>
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.4.txt
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡