spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Mechanism usage in live SPF records

2004-01-27 14:22:53
Dan and Wechsler,

Since you brought it up, if I know that my subnet will be sending email for
my domain, why not use +all? Not trolling, I really want to understand if
there is a potential for abuse related to +all for a subnet that is strictly
controlled and where the various boxes are smtp servers?

I read the spec, but I used a wizard to generate the TXT record.

Will

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
[mailto:owner-spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com]On Behalf Of Dan 
Boresjo
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2004 2:57 PM
To: spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
Subject: Re: [spf-discuss] Mechanism usage in live SPF records


On Tuesday 27 January 2004 8:41 pm, Wechsler wrote:
Hrm - looks like people aren't heeding the "use ?all for now" warning :/

Or maybe the early adopters know exactly where their mail will be coming
from?

-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.4.txt
Wiki:
http://spfwiki.infinitepenguins.net/pmwiki.php/SenderPermittedFrom/HomePage
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡

-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.4.txt
Wiki: 
http://spfwiki.infinitepenguins.net/pmwiki.php/SenderPermittedFrom/HomePage
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡