spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: SRS requirements

2004-01-14 12:09:26
In <20040114190113(_dot_)GB6875(_at_)dumbo(_dot_)pobox(_dot_)com> Meng Weng 
Wong <mengwong(_at_)dumbo(_dot_)pobox(_dot_)com> writes:

On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 12:59:49PM -0600, wayne wrote:
| 
| Can't you get rid of the "bounce+" part?  Also, depending on your
| situation, you might be able to get rid of the #pobox.com as long as
| it matches bounce.pobox.com.  That would save a few characters.
| 
| This would be shorter than many VERP schemes that are in wide use today.

what do verp schemes do if my email address is > 64?

The best that I can tell, nothing.  They send it out with "broken"
local parts.  While technically broken, this works well in the real
world.  I doubt that the VERP "standard" could ever become an RFC,
however.



-wayne

-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.4.txt
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>