On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 02:09:30PM -0600, Dustin D. Trammell wrote:
| If you define your SPF record as "spf1+", your tools will make use of
| this as will any other peers you are testing your new
| mechanisms/extensions with, and if the extensions your testing end up
| being useful, hopefully they will make it into spf2.
OK, I take it this means the spec doesn't have to change to support
version strings like v=spf1+ since they're ignored by strict v1 parsers.
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.4.txt
Wiki:
http://spfwiki.infinitepenguins.net/pmwiki.php/SenderPermittedFrom/HomePage
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡