On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 01:03:59PM -0800, Justin Mason wrote:
|
| Hi folks -- FYI, here's the hit rates of
| current SPF rules in SpamAssassin 2.70:
|
| OVERALL% SPAM% HAM% S/O RANK SCORE NAME
| 7598 4958 2640 0.653 0.00 0.00 (all messages)
| 100.000 65.2540 34.7460 0.653 0.00 0.00 (all messages as %)
| 11.700 0.3025 33.1061 0.009 0.93 -0.10 T_SPF_HELO_PASS
excellent numbers, thanks.
|
| Note that SOFTFAIL no longer seems to be working. The SpamAssassin glue
| code needs to be updated to reflect that this is no longer returned;
| I haven't been keeping that up-to-date with Mail::SPF::Query changes.
Yes, SOFTFAIL has been deprecated.
| However, overall for some reason, I'm now seeing more SPF failures in
| nonspam than in spam. This will probably result in an SPF failure
| getting a 0 score... but an SPF pass looks like a good ham-sign.
If you add a trusted-forwarder lookup, that may change things.
Also, do you have a result for T_SPF_UNKNOWN? I know SA shouldn't
assign any weight to that but it's a guide to how SPF will do once AOL
switches from ?all to -all
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.4.txt
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡