In
<200401291415(_dot_)53841(_dot_)dan(_at_)boresjo(_dot_)demon(_dot_)co(_dot_)uk>
Dan Boresjo <dan(_at_)boresjo(_dot_)demon(_dot_)co(_dot_)uk> writes:
Personally I find the current prefix highly idosyncratic. I would have made
it
"SPF:1.0" to signify "this is an SPF record, version 1.0"
I wouldn't bother changing it now, it's just a nit.
I strongly agree with not changing it now, but I kind of agree that
v=spf1 is not my preference. If I recall correctly, the original code
was to replace "spf1" with an RFC number.
-wayne
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.4.txt
Wiki:
http://spfwiki.infinitepenguins.net/pmwiki.php/SenderPermittedFrom/HomePage
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡