Re[3]: Lawsuits, angry business users, and SPF stupidity.

Hi Rik,

Take a look at mailblocks then - IMHO it's the best implementation
available for anti-spam.  SPF isn't designed for spam blocking, so if
you're looking for an anti-spam SPF is not going to solve much.

Unfortunately, for technical reasons, I can't myself use mailblocks,
but everyone I know who uses it swears by it.

There's a few other things that are similar too - I forget the names
of them, though I've been asked to authenticate by them a few times.

And of course - since it's user-to-user, nobody who isn't looking for
spam blocking gets affected (like all the users of an ISP for
example).

Kind Regards,
Chris Drake


Wednesday, January 14, 2004, 12:00:02 AM, you wrote:

RvR> On Tue, 13 Jan 2004, Chris Drake wrote:

> > You should be working on a standard that USERS can ALWAYS opt out of.
RvR> If you want such a standard, maybe you should implement it ?

RvR> I am going to focus my efforts on SPF, until something better
RvR> comes along.

RvR> Rik

-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.4.txt
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡