spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: SPF + Challenge/Response

2004-01-13 07:52:56
On Tuesday 13 January 2004 2:41 pm, tv+spf(_at_)duh(_dot_)org wrote:
Ideally, a SMTP reject rather than bounce (to lower the likelihood of
bouncing to a forged third party).

Since the message has already passed SPF checks, there is no risk of bouncing 
to a third party. 

-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.4.txt
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡