On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 01:04:31PM -0500, Meng Weng Wong wrote:
On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 05:53:46PM +0100, Alex van den Bogaerdt wrote:
| >
| > to be precise, it doesn't require the MTA to accept it. it requires the
| > MTA to transfer it, which is a bandwidth cost. in theory the MTA can
| > still reject it at "." time.
|
| Indeed. One of these days I'm going to learn how to write what I think.
|
Could ISPs please weigh in on whether your email/spam bandwidth cost is
signicant or not, thanks.
Yes.
3/4 of the mail we handle is spam.
I'd save at least 1% of my total budget if spam dissapeared, and nearly
20% of my bandwidth budget.
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.4.txt
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡