rgreene(_at_)tclme(_dot_)org (rgreene(_at_)tclme(_dot_)org) wrote:
Am I wrong in thinking that qmail can be left alone by simply adding a
mechanism to be employed in the same manner as rblsmtp is now?
rblsmtpd can reject the message based on the connection's IP address,
before the SMTP conversation (qmail-smtpd) begins. SPF can't do that;
it has to wait for the "EHLO" (or "HELO") and the "MAIL FROM:". So
it would have to be a patch/replacement for qmail-smtpd, much like
SMTP AUTH is.
--
Greg Wooledge | "Truth belongs to everybody."
greg(_at_)wooledge(_dot_)org | - The Red Hot Chili Peppers
http://wooledge.org/~greg/ |
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.4.txt
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)½§Åv¼ð¦¾Øß´ëù1Ií-»Fqx(_dot_)com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature