On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 03:13:04PM -0500, Greg Wooledge asserted:
rgreene(_at_)tclme(_dot_)org (rgreene(_at_)tclme(_dot_)org) wrote:
Am I wrong in thinking that qmail can be left alone by simply adding a
mechanism to be employed in the same manner as rblsmtp is now?
rblsmtpd can reject the message based on the connection's IP address,
before the SMTP conversation (qmail-smtpd) begins. SPF can't do that;
it has to wait for the "EHLO" (or "HELO") and the "MAIL FROM:". So
it would have to be a patch/replacement for qmail-smtpd, much like
SMTP AUTH is.
You're right. I didn't follow that through. I just saw the dns query and ran
with it.
--
Bob Greene
Public key available at
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xC9C7841C
Or, you can just pull my finger
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.4.txt
Wiki:
http://spfwiki.infinitepenguins.net/pmwiki.php/SenderPermittedFrom/HomePage
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡