spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Redundant / unused SPF features?

2004-01-26 18:42:21
All,

        One of the issues that keeps being brought up on con calls is
whether some SPF directive is necessary or not. Now that we have quite a few
records out there it would be good to take a look at which records are being
used all the time and which (if any) are not being used very much.

        It kind of finishes an argument if someone says 'that feature is
used in 50% of all SPF record sets', for that matter the argument is also
likely to end quickly if the answer is '2 deployments out of 5000 used
feature X', the admins say they could switch easily.

        We are reaching the point where having such figures to hand will be
very useful.

                Phill

-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.4.txt
Wiki: 
http://spfwiki.infinitepenguins.net/pmwiki.php/SenderPermittedFrom/HomePage
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>