Hi,
there are three comments posted to the RISKS list that i find worth
considering in terms of both the political and the technical aspects of the
development of anti-spam measures.
Have the issues been addressed that were mentioned in the post archived at
www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/200401/msg00037.html ?
I like the "open source" approach to developing SPF, but i wonder where and
how communication has failed/is failing if there is such a division between
SPF developers and certain people who to me would seem to be natural allies.
Those three comments can be found at the following locations, and by
looking there for the strings shown below the URLs:
ftp://ftp.sri.com/risks/risks-23.16
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 10:11:35 -0000
Subject: Defeating phishing scams
ftp://ftp.sri.com/risks/risks-23.18
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 14:25:33 +0000
Subject: Opposition to SPF (Re: Rose, RISKS-23.16)
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2004 03:28:47 +0100
Subject: Actually, SPF makes things worse (Re: Rose, RISKS-23.16)
Regards: Hendrik