SPF Discuss (thread)
General Status of SPF,
Laszlo Toth,
2004/02/26
- Re: General Status of SPF, David Woodhouse, 2004/02/26
- Re: General Status of SPF, Za'mbori, Zolta'n, 2004/02/26
- Re: General Status of SPF, Dan Boresjo, 2004/02/26
- Re: General Status of SPF, Andrew W . Donoho, 2004/02/26
- Re: General Status of SPF, Theo Schlossnagle, 2004/02/26
- Re: General Status of SPF, Dustin D. Trammell, 2004/02/27
- Re: General Status of SPF, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/02/27
- Re: General Status of SPF (forwarding and rewriting), Za'mbori, Zolta'n, 2004/02/27
- Re: General Status of SPF, David Woodhouse, 2004/02/27
- Re: General Status of SPF, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/02/27
- Re: General Status of SPF, David Woodhouse, 2004/02/27
- Signed Envelope Sender: SRS on steroids, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/02/27
- Re: Signed Envelope Sender: SRS on steroids, David Woodhouse, 2004/02/27
- Re: Signed Envelope Sender: SRS on steroids, Mark, 2004/02/27
- Re: Signed Envelope Sender: SRS on steroids, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/02/28
- Re: Signed Envelope Sender: SRS on steroids, Mark, 2004/02/28
- Re: Signed Envelope Sender: SRS on steroids, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/02/28
- Re: Signed Envelope Sender: SRS on steroids, list+spf-discuss, 2004/02/28
- Re: Signed Envelope Sender: SRS on steroids, Daniel Roethlisberger, 2004/02/28
- Re: Signed Envelope Sender: SRS on steroids, John A. Martin, 2004/02/28
- Re: Re: Signed Envelope Sender: SRS on steroids, Daniel Roethlisberger, 2004/02/28
- Re: Signed Envelope Sender: SRS on steroids, David Woodhouse, 2004/02/28
- Re: Signed Envelope Sender: SRS on steroids, list+spf-discuss, 2004/02/28
- Re: Signed Envelope Sender: SRS on steroids, Greg Wooledge, 2004/02/28
- Re: Signed Envelope Sender: SRS on steroids, list+spf-discuss, 2004/02/29
- Signed Envelope Sender: moving back to srs-discuss, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/02/27
- Re: General Status of SPF, Bourque Daniel, 2004/02/26
- Re: General Status of SPF, Laszlo Toth, 2004/02/26
amazon.com has published SPF (and Caller-ID),
Meng Weng Wong,
2004/02/25
- Re: amazon.com has published SPF (and Caller-ID), Ernesto Baschny, 2004/02/25
- cost comparison of Caller-ID, DK, and SPF, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/02/25
- Re: cost comparison of Caller-ID, DK, and SPF, wayne, 2004/02/25
- Re: cost comparison of Caller-ID, DK, and SPF, Justin Mason, 2004/02/25
- Re: cost comparison of Caller-ID, DK, and SPF, David Woodhouse, 2004/02/25
- Re: cost comparison of Caller-ID, DK, and SPF, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/02/25
- Re: cost comparison of Caller-ID, DK, and SPF, David Woodhouse, 2004/02/25
- Re: cost comparison of Caller-ID, DK, and SPF, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/02/25
- on moving from heuristics toward certainty, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/02/25
- Re: on moving from heuristics toward certainty, David Woodhouse, 2004/02/25
- Re: on moving from heuristics toward certainty, wayne, 2004/02/25
- Re: on moving from heuristics toward certainty, Fridrik Skulason, 2004/02/25
- how the board might look a few moves ahead, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/02/25
- Re: how the board might look a few moves ahead, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/02/25
- Re: on moving from heuristics toward certainty, David Brodbeck, 2004/02/25
- Re: cost comparison of Caller-ID, DK, and SPF, wayne, 2004/02/25
- Re: cost comparison of Caller-ID, DK, and SPF, David Woodhouse, 2004/02/25
- Re: cost comparison of Caller-ID, DK, and SPF, wayne, 2004/02/25
- body hashing (was Re: cost comparison of Caller-ID, DK, and SPF), Justin Mason, 2004/02/25
- Re: cost comparison of Caller-ID, DK, and SPF, Greg Wooledge, 2004/02/25
- Re: cost comparison of Caller-ID, DK, and SPF, Roy Badami, 2004/02/26
- technical comparison, Caller-ID and SPF, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/02/25
Why keep people thinking HELO checks provide a loophole?,
Mark,
2004/02/24
- Re: Why keep people thinking HELO checks provide a loophole?, David Woodhouse, 2004/02/25
- Re: Why keep people thinking HELO checks provide a loophole?, Mark, 2004/02/25
- Re: Why keep people thinking HELO checks provide a loophole?, David Woodhouse, 2004/02/25
- Re: Why keep people thinking HELO checks provide aloophole?, Mark, 2004/02/25
- Re: Why keep people thinking HELO checks provide a loophole?, Fridrik Skulason, 2004/02/25
- Re: Why keep people thinking HELO checks provide a loophole?, Lloyd Zusman, 2004/02/25
- Re: Re: Why keep people thinking HELO checks provide a loophole?, David Brodbeck, 2004/02/25
- Re: Re: Why keep people thinking HELO checks provide a loophole?, Fridrik Skulason, 2004/02/25
- Re: Why keep people thinking HELO checks provide a loophole?, Lloyd Zusman, 2004/02/25
- Re: Why keep people thinking HELO checks provide a loophole?, Matthew Barr, 2004/02/25
review of the MS Caller-ID draft,
Meng Weng Wong,
2004/02/24
- Re: review of the MS Caller-ID draft, wayne, 2004/02/24
- Re: review of the MS Caller-ID draft, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/02/24
- Re: review of the MS Caller-ID draft, wayne, 2004/02/24
- MS-Caller-ID to SPF converter (cid2spf.pl), Ernesto Baschny, 2004/02/25
- Re: MS-Caller-ID to SPF converter (cid2spf.pl), Ernesto Baschny, 2004/02/25
- Re: MS-Caller-ID to SPF converter (cid2spf.pl), Ernesto Baschny, 2004/02/25
- Re: MS-Caller-ID to SPF converter (cid2spf.pl), wayne, 2004/02/25
- Re: MS-Caller-ID to SPF converter (cid2spf.pl), Ernesto Baschny, 2004/02/25
- Re: MS-Caller-ID to SPF converter (cid2spf.pl), Matt Sergeant, 2004/02/25
- Re: review of the MS Caller-ID draft, David Woodhouse, 2004/02/24
- Re: review of the MS Caller-ID draft, discussion-lists, 2004/02/27
Possible SPF machine-domain loophole???,
Hector Santos,
2004/02/23
- Re: Possible SPF machine-domain loophole???, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/02/23
- Re: Possible SPF machine-domain loophole???, Hector Santos, 2004/02/23
- Re: Possible SPF machine-domain loophole???, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/02/23
- Re: Possible SPF machine-domain loophole???, Hector Santos, 2004/02/23
- the role of the HELO domain, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/02/23
- Re: the role of the HELO domain, Hector Santos, 2004/02/23
- Re: the role of the HELO domain, Ernesto Baschny, 2004/02/24
- Re: the role of the HELO domain, Brian Candler, 2004/02/24
- Re: the role of the HELO domain, Frank Segtrop, 2004/02/24
- Re: the role of the HELO domain, Hector Santos, 2004/02/24
- Re: the role of the HELO domain, Hector Santos, 2004/02/24
- Re: the role of the HELO domain, Brian Candler, 2004/02/24
- Re: Possible SPF machine-domain loophole???, wayne, 2004/02/24
- RE: Possible SPF machine-domain loophole???, Seth Goodman, 2004/02/24
- Re: Possible SPF machine-domain loophole???, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/02/24
- Re: Possible SPF machine-domain loophole???, wayne, 2004/02/24
- Re: Possible SPF machine-domain loophole???, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/02/24
- Re: Possible SPF machine-domain loophole???, Hector Santos, 2004/02/24
- Re: Possible SPF machine-domain loophole???, Theo Schlossnagle, 2004/02/24
- Re: Possible SPF machine-domain loophole???, Ernesto Baschny, 2004/02/24
- how to protect the HELO using SPF, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/02/24
- Re: how to protect the HELO using SPF, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/02/24
- Re: how to protect the HELO using SPF, Ernesto Baschny, 2004/02/24
- Re: how to protect the HELO using SPF, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/02/24
- Re: how to protect the HELO using SPF, Mark Shewmaker, 2004/02/24
- Re: how to protect the HELO using SPF, Hector Santos, 2004/02/24
- Re: how to protect the HELO using SPF, list+spf-discuss, 2004/02/25
- Re: how to protect the HELO using SPF, wayne, 2004/02/24
- Re: how to protect the HELO using SPF, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/02/24
- Re: Redirect/Include Restriction --> was Re: how to protect the HELO using SPF, Hector Santos, 2004/02/24
- Re: how to protect the HELO using SPF, list+spf-discuss, 2004/02/25
- Re: Possible SPF machine-domain loophole???, Brian Candler, 2004/02/24
- Re: Possible SPF machine-domain loophole???, list+spf-discuss, 2004/02/25
- Re: Possible SPF machine-domain loophole???, Ernesto Baschny, 2004/02/24
- Re: Possible SPF machine-domain loophole???, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/02/24
- Re: Possible SPF machine-domain loophole???, wayne, 2004/02/24
- Re: Possible SPF machine-domain loophole???, Theo Schlossnagle, 2004/02/24
- Re: Possible SPF machine-domain loophole???, Ernesto Baschny, 2004/02/24
- Re: Possible SPF machine-domain loophole???, Greg Connor, 2004/02/24
- Re: Possible SPF machine-domain loophole???, Ernesto Baschny, 2004/02/25
- Re: Possible SPF machine-domain loophole???, Greg Connor, 2004/02/25
- Re: Possible SPF machine-domain loophole???, Hector Santos, 2004/02/25
- Re: Possible SPF machine-domain loophole???, Mark, 2004/02/25
- Re: Possible SPF machine-domain loophole???, Hector Santos, 2004/02/29
- Re: Possible SPF machine-domain loophole???, Mark, 2004/02/29
- Re: Possible SPF machine-domain loophole???, Theo Schlossnagle, 2004/02/29
- Re: Possible SPF machine-domain loophole???, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/02/29
- Re: Possible SPF machine-domain loophole???, Theo Schlossnagle, 2004/02/29
- Re: Possible SPF machine-domain loophole???, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/02/29
- Re: Possible SPF machine-domain loophole???, Theo Schlossnagle, 2004/02/29
- Re: Possible SPF machine-domain loophole???, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/02/29
- Re: Possible SPF machine-domain loophole???, list+spf-discuss, 2004/02/29
- Re: Possible SPF machine-domain loophole???, David Brodbeck, 2004/02/29
- Re: Possible SPF machine-domain loophole???, Greg Connor, 2004/02/25
- Re: Possible SPF machine-domain loophole???, Hector Santos, 2004/02/25
- Re: Possible SPF machine-domain loophole???, Greg Connor, 2004/02/25
- Re: Possible SPF machine-domain loophole???, Hector Santos, 2004/02/26
- Re: Possible SPF machine-domain loophole???, Greg Connor, 2004/02/26
- Re: Possible SPF machine-domain loophole???, Hector Santos, 2004/02/26
- Re: Possible SPF machine-domain loophole???, Kelson Vibber, 2004/02/26
- Re: Possible SPF machine-domain loophole???, Hector Santos, 2004/02/26
- Re: Possible SPF machine-domain loophole???, list+spf-discuss, 2004/02/28
- Re: Possible SPF machine-domain loophole???, Jim Ramsay, 2004/02/26
- Re: Re: Possible SPF machine-domain loophole???, Hector Santos, 2004/02/26
- Re: Re: Possible SPF machine-domain loophole???, Greg Connor, 2004/02/26
- Re: Re: Possible SPF machine-domain loophole???, Hector Santos, 2004/02/27
- Re: Re: Possible SPF machine-domain loophole???, Mark, 2004/02/26
- Re: Re: Possible SPF machine-domain loophole???, Hector Santos, 2004/02/29
- Re: Re: Possible SPF machine-domain loophole???, Mark, 2004/02/29
- Re: Re: Possible SPF machine-domain loophole???, Hector Santos, 2004/02/29
- Design choice vs loophole, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/02/29
- Re: Design choice vs loophole, Za'mbori, Zolta'n, 2004/02/29
- Re: Re: Design choice vs loophole, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/02/29
- Re: Re: Possible SPF machine-domain loophole???, Theo Schlossnagle, 2004/02/29
- Re: Re: Possible SPF machine-domain loophole???, Mark, 2004/02/26
- Re: Possible SPF machine-domain loophole???, David Woodhouse, 2004/02/24
- Re: Possible SPF machine-domain loophole???, Hector Santos, 2004/02/24
- RE: Possible SPF machine-domain loophole???, Seth Goodman, 2004/02/24
- RE: Possible SPF machine-domain loophole???, Dustin D. Trammell, 2004/02/24
- RE: Possible SPF machine-domain loophole???, Seth Goodman, 2004/02/24
- RE: Possible SPF machine-domain loophole???, Theo Schlossnagle, 2004/02/24
- RE: Possible SPF machine-domain loophole???, Mark Shewmaker, 2004/02/24
- Re: Possible SPF machine-domain loophole???, Matt Sergeant, 2004/02/25
- Re: Possible SPF machine-domain loophole???, Justin Mason, 2004/02/25
- Re: Possible SPF machine-domain loophole???, Theo Schlossnagle, 2004/02/25
- RE: Possible SPF machine-domain loophole???, list+spf-discuss, 2004/02/25
- RE: Possible SPF machine-domain loophole???, Dustin D. Trammell, 2004/02/24
- RE: Possible SPF machine-domain loophole???, Dustin D. Trammell, 2004/02/24
Performance issues,
Hector Santos,
2004/02/16
- Re: Performance issues, Theo Schlossnagle, 2004/02/16
- Re: Performance issues, Hector Santos, 2004/02/16
- Re: Performance issues, Theo Schlossnagle, 2004/02/16
- Re: Performance issues, Hector Santos, 2004/02/17
- Re: Performance issues, Theo Schlossnagle, 2004/02/17
- Re: Performance issues, Hector Santos, 2004/02/17
- Re: Performance issues, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/02/17
- Re: Performance issues, Hector Santos, 2004/02/17
- Re: Performance issues, Hector Santos, 2004/02/18
- Re: Performance issues, Theo Schlossnagle, 2004/02/17
- Re: Performance issues, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/02/17
- Re: Performance issues, Theo Schlossnagle, 2004/02/17
- softfail considered harmful, Dan Boresjo, 2004/02/18
- Re: softfail considered harmful, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/02/18
- Re: softfail considered harmful, Dan Boresjo, 2004/02/18
- Re: softfail considered harmful, Hector Santos, 2004/02/18
- Re: softfail considered harmful, wayne, 2004/02/18
- Re: softfail considered harmful, Dan Boresjo, 2004/02/18
- Re: softfail considered harmful, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/02/18
- Re: softfail considered harmful, Brian Candler, 2004/02/18
- Re: softfail considered harmful, Hector Santos, 2004/02/19
- Re: softfail considered harmful, Dan Boresjo, 2004/02/19
- Re: softfail considered harmful, Hector Santos, 2004/02/19
- Re: softfail considered harmful, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/02/19
- Re: softfail considered harmful, Hector Santos, 2004/02/19
- Re: softfail considered harmful, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/02/20
- Re: softfail considered harmful, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/02/18
- Re: softfail considered harmful, Dan Boresjo, 2004/02/18
- Re: softfail considered harmful, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/02/18
- Re: softfail considered harmful, David Brodbeck, 2004/02/18
- Re: softfail considered harmful, Dan Boresjo, 2004/02/18
- Re: Performance issues, Greg Connor, 2004/02/22
A couple of thoughts,
Brian Candler,
2004/02/13
- Re: A couple of thoughts, Brian Candler, 2004/02/13
- Re: A couple of thoughts, wayne, 2004/02/13
- Re: A couple of thoughts, Brian Candler, 2004/02/13
- Re: A couple of thoughts, Brian Candler, 2004/02/13
- Re: A couple of thoughts, Greg Connor, 2004/02/22
- Re: A couple of thoughts, Brian Candler, 2004/02/22
- Please Move SRS Discussion To SRS-Discuss; Linux Journal diagram, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/02/22
- Re: tagging the return path from the get-go, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/02/13
- Re: tagging the return path from the get-go, Brian Candler, 2004/02/13
- Re: tagging the return path from the get-go, mw-list-spf-discuss, 2004/02/19
- Re: A couple of thoughts, Matt Sergeant, 2004/02/13
- Re: A couple of thoughts, George Schlossnagle, 2004/02/13
- Re: A couple of thoughts, Brian Candler, 2004/02/17
- Re: A couple of thoughts, mw-list-spf-discuss, 2004/02/19
- Re: A couple of thoughts, Brian Candler, 2004/02/19
- Re: A couple of thoughts, mw-list-spf-discuss, 2004/02/19
- Re: A couple of thoughts, Brian Candler, 2004/02/20
- Re: A couple of thoughts, mw-list-spf-discuss, 2004/02/19
- Re: A couple of thoughts, Shevek, 2004/02/19
- Re: A couple of thoughts, mw-list-spf-discuss, 2004/02/19
- Re: A couple of thoughts, wayne, 2004/02/19
- Re: A couple of thoughts, Hector Santos, 2004/02/19
- Re: A couple of thoughts, Theo Schlossnagle, 2004/02/19
- Re: A couple of thoughts, Hector Santos, 2004/02/19
- Re: A couple of thoughts, wayne, 2004/02/19
- Re: A couple of thoughts, mw-list-spf-discuss, 2004/02/19
- Re: A couple of thoughts, wayne, 2004/02/19
- Re: A couple of thoughts, Greg Connor, 2004/02/22
- Re: A couple of thoughts, Greg Wooledge, 2004/02/13
- Re: A couple of thoughts, Shevek, 2004/02/14
- Re: A couple of thoughts, Greg Wooledge, 2004/02/14
- SRS integration with qmail (was: A couple of thoughts), Greg Wooledge, 2004/02/15
- SRS Please move this discussion to SPF-devel, James Couzens, 2004/02/16
- RE: SRS integration with qmail (was: A couple of thoughts), Seth Goodman, 2004/02/16
- Re: SRS integration with qmail (was: A couple of thoughts), Greg Wooledge, 2004/02/16
- Re: SRS integration with qmail (was: A couple of thoughts), Mark, 2004/02/17
- Re: SPF/SRS problem domain (was: SRS integration with qmail), Brian Candler, 2004/02/19
- Re: SPF/SRS problem domain (was: SRS integration with qmail), Brian Candler, 2004/02/19
- Re: SRS integration with qmail (was: A couple of thoughts), mw-list-spf-discuss, 2004/02/19
- Re: SRS integration with qmail, wayne, 2004/02/19
- Re: Re: SRS integration with qmail, mw-list-spf-discuss, 2004/02/19
- Re: Re: SRS integration with qmail, wayne, 2004/02/19
- Re: A couple of thoughts, Brian Candler, 2004/02/16
- Re: A couple of thoughts, John Warren, 2004/02/17
- Re: A couple of thoughts, Mark, 2004/02/14
- Re: A couple of thoughts, Shevek, 2004/02/14
- Re: A couple of thoughts, Mark, 2004/02/14
- Re: A couple of thoughts, Shevek, 2004/02/15
- Re: A couple of thoughts, Mark, 2004/02/15
- Re: A couple of thoughts, Greg Connor, 2004/02/22
- Message not available
- Re: [spf-discuss] A couple of thoughts, Mark, 2004/02/22
- Re: A couple of thoughts, Mark, 2004/02/15
- Re: A couple of thoughts, Shevek, 2004/02/15
- Re: A couple of thoughts, Tim Wilde, 2004/02/15
- Re: A couple of thoughts, John Warren, 2004/02/17
- Re: A couple of thoughts, Mark, 2004/02/15
- Re: A couple of thoughts, wayne, 2004/02/15
- Re: A couple of thoughts, Daniel Roethlisberger, 2004/02/15
- Re: A couple of thoughts, Mark, 2004/02/15
- Re: A couple of thoughts, Dan Boresjo, 2004/02/16
- Re: A couple of thoughts, Brian Candler, 2004/02/16
- What does SRS break [was: A couple of thoughts], Brian Candler, 2004/02/16
- RE: A couple of thoughts, Dustin D. Trammell, 2004/02/17
- RE: A couple of thoughts, Dustin D. Trammell, 2004/02/19
- RE: A couple of thoughts, Dustin D. Trammell, 2004/02/19
Updates on SRS crypto,
Shevek,
2004/02/11
- Re: Updates on SRS crypto, wayne, 2004/02/11
- Re: Updates on SRS crypto, Daniel Roethlisberger, 2004/02/11
- RE: Updates on SRS crypto, Seth Goodman, 2004/02/11
- Re: Updates on SRS crypto, wayne, 2004/02/11
- Re: Updates on SRS crypto, George Schlossnagle, 2004/02/11
- Re: Updates on SRS crypto, wayne, 2004/02/11
- Re: Updates on SRS crypto, mw-list-spf-discuss, 2004/02/18
- Re: Updates on SRS crypto, Alain Knaff, 2004/02/11
- RE: Updates on SRS crypto, Seth Goodman, 2004/02/11
- Re: Updates on SRS crypto, wayne, 2004/02/11
- RE: Updates on SRS crypto, Seth Goodman, 2004/02/11
- Re: Updates on SRS crypto, George Schlossnagle, 2004/02/11
- Re: Updates on SRS crypto, Theo Schlossnagle, 2004/02/11
- Re: Updates on SRS crypto, Shevek, 2004/02/11
- Re: Updates on SRS crypto, George Schlossnagle, 2004/02/11
- Re: Updates on SRS crypto, Theo Schlossnagle, 2004/02/11
- Re: Updates on SRS crypto, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/02/11
- Re: Updates on SRS crypto, Theo Schlossnagle, 2004/02/11
- Re: Updates on SRS crypto, Shevek, 2004/02/11
- Re: Updates on SRS crypto, mw-list-spf-discuss, 2004/02/18
- Re: Updates on SRS crypto, George Schlossnagle, 2004/02/18
- Re: Updates on SRS crypto, James Couzens, 2004/02/18
- Re: Updates on SRS crypto, mw-list-spf-discuss, 2004/02/18
- Re: Updates on SRS crypto, George Schlossnagle, 2004/02/18
- Re: Updates on SRS crypto, mw-list-spf-discuss, 2004/02/19
- Re: Updates on SRS crypto, George Schlossnagle, 2004/02/19
- Re: Updates on SRS crypto, mw-list-spf-discuss, 2004/02/20
- Re: Updates on SRS crypto, George Schlossnagle, 2004/02/20
- Re: Updates on SRS crypto, mw-list-spf-discuss, 2004/02/20
- Re: Updates on SRS crypto, Brian Candler, 2004/02/21
- Re: Updates on SRS crypto, Greg Wooledge, 2004/02/21
- Re: Updates on SRS crypto, Brian Candler, 2004/02/21
- Re: Updates on SRS crypto, Mark, 2004/02/21
- Re: Updates on SRS crypto, Philip Gladstone, 2004/02/11
- RE: Updates on SRS crypto, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/02/11
- Re: Updates on SRS crypto, wayne, 2004/02/11
- Re: Updates on SRS crypto, Shevek, 2004/02/11
- Re: Updates on SRS crypto, mw-list-spf-discuss, 2004/02/18
- Re: Updates on SRS crypto, wayne, 2004/02/18
- Re: Updates on SRS crypto, mw-list-spf-discuss, 2004/02/18
- Re: Updates on SRS crypto, Brian Candler, 2004/02/18
- Re: Updates on SRS crypto, mw-list-spf-discuss, 2004/02/18
- Re: Updates on SRS crypto, Brian Candler, 2004/02/19
- Re: Updates on SRS crypto, mw-list-spf-discuss, 2004/02/19
- Re: Updates on SRS crypto, Greg Wooledge, 2004/02/19
- Re: Updates on SRS crypto, mw-list-spf-discuss, 2004/02/20
- Re: Updates on SRS crypto, wayne, 2004/02/20
- Re: Updates on SRS crypto, Brian Candler, 2004/02/20
- Re: Updates on SRS crypto, wayne, 2004/02/20
- Re: Updates on SRS crypto, Nick Phillips, 2004/02/19
- RE: Updates on SRS crypto, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/02/11
- RE: Updates on SRS crypto, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/02/11
- RE: Updates on SRS crypto, Dustin D. Trammell, 2004/02/12
- RE: Updates on SRS crypto, Dustin D. Trammell, 2004/02/19
- Re: Updates on SRS crypto, Brian Candler, 2004/02/20
- Re: Updates on SRS crypto, Theo Schlossnagle, 2004/02/20
- Re: Updates on SRS crypto, Brian Candler, 2004/02/20
- Re: Updates on SRS crypto, David Brodbeck, 2004/02/20
- Re: Updates on SRS crypto, Brian Candler, 2004/02/20
- "Extreme SPF" part II, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/02/20
- Re: "Extreme SPF" part II, Brian Candler, 2004/02/21
- Re: Updates on SRS crypto, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/02/21
- RE: Updates on SRS crypto, Dustin D. Trammell, 2004/02/20
- RE: Updates on SRS crypto, Dustin D. Trammell, 2004/02/23
RE: Re: SRS and the 64 char limit,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip,
2004/02/10
- Re: Re: SRS and the 64 char limit, Daniel Roethlisberger, 2004/02/10
- Re: Re: SRS and the 64 char limit, James Couzens, 2004/02/10
- Re: Re: SRS and the 64 char limit, mw-list-spf-discuss, 2004/02/13
- Re: Re: SRS and the 64 char limit, wayne, 2004/02/13
- Re: SRS and the 64 char limit, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2004/02/13
- Re: Re: SRS and the 64 char limit, wayne, 2004/02/13
- Re: Re: SRS and the 64 char limit, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/02/13
- Re: Re: SRS and the 64 char limit, wayne, 2004/02/14
- Re: Re: SRS and the 64 char limit, mw-list-spf-discuss, 2004/02/18
- Re: Re: SRS and the 64 char limit, Justin Mason, 2004/02/13
- Re: Re: SRS and the 64 char limit, Shevek, 2004/02/14
- Re: Re: SRS and the 64 char limit, mw-list-spf-discuss, 2004/02/17
will resistant MTAs be fronted with commercial antispam gateways?,
Meng Weng Wong,
2004/02/10
- Re: will resistant MTAs be fronted with commercial antispam gateways?, wayne, 2004/02/10
- Re: will resistant MTAs be fronted with commercial antispam gateways?, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/02/10
- Re: will resistant MTAs be fronted with commercial antispam gateways?, Jameel Akari, 2004/02/10
- Re: will resistant MTAs be fronted with commercial antispam gateways?, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/02/10
- Re: will resistant MTAs be fronted with commercial antispam gateways?, Jameel Akari, 2004/02/10
- Re: will resistant MTAs be fronted with commercial antispam gateways?, John Capo, 2004/02/10
- Re: will resistant MTAs be fronted with commercial antispam gateways?, Justin Mason, 2004/02/10
- Re: will resistant MTAs be fronted with commercial antispam gateways?, Richard Bollinger, 2004/02/10
- Re: will resistant MTAs be fronted with commercial antispam gateways?, Justin Mason, 2004/02/10
- Re: will resistant MTAs be fronted with commercial antispam gateways?, David Brodbeck, 2004/02/10
- Re: will resistant MTAs be fronted with commercial antispam gateways?, Matt Perry, 2004/02/10
- Re: Re: will resistant MTAs be fronted with commercial antispam gateways?, wayne, 2004/02/10
- Re: Re: will resistant MTAs be fronted with commercial antispam gateways?, Daniel Roethlisberger, 2004/02/10
- Re: Re: will resistant MTAs be fronted with commercial antispam gateways?, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/02/10
- SRS [was Re: Re: will resistant MTAs be fronted with commercial antispam gateways?], George Schlossnagle, 2004/02/10
- Re: SRS and the 64 char limit, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/02/10
- Re: Re: SRS and the 64 char limit, George Schlossnagle, 2004/02/10
- Re: Re: SRS and the 64 char limit, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/02/10
- Re: Re: SRS and the 64 char limit, George Schlossnagle, 2004/02/10
- Re: SRS [was Re: Re: will resistant MTAs be fronted with commercial antispam gateways?], mw-list-spf-discuss, 2004/02/17
- Re: SRS, wayne, 2004/02/17
- Re: Re: SRS, mw-list-spf-discuss, 2004/02/18
- Re: Re: SRS, wayne, 2004/02/18
- SRS in .forward and reversing in /etc/aliases, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/02/17
- Re: SRS in .forward and reversing in /etc/aliases, Shevek, 2004/02/18
- Re: SRS in .forward and reversing in /etc/aliases, mw-list-spf-discuss, 2004/02/18
- Re: SRS in .forward and reversing in /etc/aliases, mw-list-spf-discuss, 2004/02/18
- Re: SRS in .forward and reversing in /etc/aliases, Shevek, 2004/02/18
- Re: SRS in .forward and reversing in /etc/aliases, mw-list-spf-discuss, 2004/02/18
- Re: SRS in .forward and reversing in /etc/aliases, Daniel Roethlisberger, 2004/02/18
- Re: SRS in .forward and reversing in /etc/aliases, Shevek, 2004/02/18
- Re: SRS in .forward and reversing in /etc/aliases, Daniel Roethlisberger, 2004/02/18
- Re: SRS in .forward and reversing in /etc/aliases, mw-list-spf-discuss, 2004/02/18
- Re: SRS in .forward and reversing in /etc/aliases, Greg Wooledge, 2004/02/18
- Re: will resistant MTAs be fronted with commercial antispam gateways?, Daniel Roethlisberger, 2004/02/10
- Re: Re: will resistant MTAs be fronted with commercial antispam gateways?, Roy Badami, 2004/02/11
- SRS and the 11 year period, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/02/11
- SRS and the 11 year period, Roy Badami, 2004/02/11
- Re: SRS and the 11 year period, wayne, 2004/02/11
- Re: SRS and the 11 year period, Shevek, 2004/02/11
- Re: SRS and the 11 year period, mw-list-spf-discuss, 2004/02/18
- Re: Re: will resistant MTAs be fronted with commercial antispam gateways?, wayne, 2004/02/11
- Re: will resistant MTAs be fronted with commercial antispam gateways?, George Schlossnagle, 2004/02/10
- RE: will resistant MTAs be fronted with commercial antispam gateways?, Nick Fields, 2004/02/10
- Re: will resistant MTAs be fronted with commercial antispam gateways?, Carsten Kuckuk, 2004/02/11
- Re: will resistant MTAs be fronted with commercial antispam gateways?, Carsten Kuckuk, 2004/02/11
RE: DNS gurus: What is the max length of a TXT rec ords?,
Marc Alaia,
2004/02/09
- Re: DNS gurus: What is the max length of a TXT rec ords?, wayne, 2004/02/09
- Re: DNS gurus: What is the max length of a TXT rec ords?, Sam Norris, 2004/02/09
- Re: DNS gurus: What is the max length of a TXT rec ords?, wayne, 2004/02/09
- Re: DNS gurus: What is the max length of a TXT rec ords?, spf-discuss, 2004/02/09
- Re: DNS gurus: What is the max length of a TXT rec ords?, wayne, 2004/02/09
- Re: DNS gurus: What is the max length of a TXT rec ords?, Sam Norris, 2004/02/10
- Re: DNS gurus: What is the max length of a TXT rec ords?, wayne, 2004/02/10
- Re: DNS gurus: What is the max length of a TXT rec ords?, Greg Connor, 2004/02/22
DNS gurus: What is the max length of a TXT records?,
wayne,
2004/02/09
- Re: DNS gurus: What is the max length of a TXT records?, Leonard Orb, 2004/02/09
- Re: DNS gurus: What is the max length of a TXT records?, Za'mbori, Zolta'n, 2004/02/09
- Re: Re: DNS gurus: What is the max length of a TXT records?, spf, 2004/02/19
- Re: Re: DNS gurus: What is the max length of a TXT records?, wayne, 2004/02/19
- Re: DNS gurus: What is the max length of a TXT records?, "Zámbori, Zoltán", 2004/02/19
- Re: Re: DNS gurus: What is the max length of a TXT records?, Shevek, 2004/02/19
- Re: DNS gurus: What is the max length of a TXT records?, "Zámbori, Zoltán", 2004/02/20
- SPF TXT record compression schemes, etc, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/02/20
specification 02.9.7 released,
Meng Weng Wong,
2004/02/07
- Re: specification 02.9.7 released, Mark Shewmaker, 2004/02/08
- Re: specification 02.9.7 released, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/02/08
- Re: specification 02.9.7 released, Karl Kraft, 2004/02/08
- Re: specification 02.9.7 released, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/02/08
- Re: specification 02.9.7 released, Karl Kraft, 2004/02/08
- Re: specification 02.9.7 released, Mark Lentczner, 2004/02/08
- Re: specification 02.9.7 released, David Brodbeck, 2004/02/08
- Re: specification 02.9.7 released, Mark Shewmaker, 2004/02/08
- Re: specification 02.9.7 released, Greg Connor, 2004/02/13
- Re: specification 02.9.7 released, Tim Wilde, 2004/02/13
- the "implicit-MX" rule and a proposed BCP, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/02/13
- Re: the "implicit-MX" rule and a proposed BCP, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/02/13
- Re: the "implicit-MX" rule and a proposed BCP, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/02/14
- Re: the "implicit-MX" rule and a proposed BCP, Shevek, 2004/02/14
- Re: the "implicit-MX" rule and a proposed BCP, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/02/14
- Re: the "implicit-MX" rule and a proposed BCP, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/02/14
- Re: the "implicit-MX" rule and a proposed BCP, Philip Gladstone, 2004/02/14
- Re: the "implicit-MX" rule and a proposed BCP, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/02/14
- Re: the "implicit-MX" rule and a proposed BCP, Philip Gladstone, 2004/02/14
- Re: the "implicit-MX" rule and a proposed BCP, Greg Connor, 2004/02/16
- Re: the "implicit-MX" rule and a proposed BCP, Brian Candler, 2004/02/16
- Re: specification 02.9.7 released, Mark Shewmaker, 2004/02/08
Re: SPF in MTAs,
Gregory Neil Shapiro,
2004/02/07
- Re: SPF in MTAs, James Couzens, 2004/02/07
- Re: SPF in MTAs, Greg Wooledge, 2004/02/07
- Re: SPF in MTAs, James Couzens, 2004/02/07
- Re: SPF in MTAs, George Schlossnagle, 2004/02/07
- Re: SPF in MTAs, James Couzens, 2004/02/07
- Re: SPF in MTAs, George Schlossnagle, 2004/02/07
- Re: SPF in MTAs, James Couzens, 2004/02/07
- Re: SPF in MTAs, George Schlossnagle, 2004/02/07
- Re: SPF in MTAs, James Couzens, 2004/02/07
- Re: SPF in MTAs, David Brodbeck, 2004/02/08
- Re: SPF in MTAs, Dave Camp, 2004/02/08
- Re: SPF in MTAs, Roger, 2004/02/09
- Re: Re: SPF in MTAs, Roger, 2004/02/12
SPF extension,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip,
2004/02/04
- Re: SPF extension, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/02/04
- Re: SPF extension, wayne, 2004/02/04
- RE: SPF extension, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/02/04
- RE: SPF extension, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/02/04
- RE: SPF extension, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/02/04
- RE: SPF extension, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/02/04
- RE: SPF extension, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/02/04
- RE: SPF extension, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/02/04
NXDOMAIN,
Marc Alaia,
2004/02/03
- Re: NXDOMAIN, Mark Anderson, 2004/02/03
- Re: NXDOMAIN, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/02/03
- Re: NXDOMAIN, Philip Gladstone, 2004/02/03
- Re: NXDOMAIN, Kelson Vibber, 2004/02/03
- Re: NXDOMAIN, David Brodbeck, 2004/02/03
- Re: NXDOMAIN, Jason, 2004/02/04
- RE: NXDOMAIN, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/02/03
Some of the other big players..,
Matthew Barr,
2004/02/03
- RE: Some of the other big players.., Marc Alaia, 2004/02/03
- Re: Some of the other big players.., Matthew Barr, 2004/02/03
- Re: Some of the other big players.., wayne, 2004/02/03
- Help needed for SPF support in MTAs, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/02/03
- Re: Help needed for SPF support in MTAs, David Brodbeck, 2004/02/03
- Re: Help needed for SPF support in MTAs, Matthew Barr, 2004/02/03
- Re: Help needed for SPF support in MTAs, Alain Knaff, 2004/02/03
- Experimental phase, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/02/03
- Re: Experimental phase, Christophe Saout, 2004/02/03
- Re: Experimental phase, wayne, 2004/02/03
- Re: Experimental phase, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/02/03
Re: Stats script for Postfix policy daemon,
Brian Nelson,
2004/02/02
- Re: Stats script for Postfix policy daemon, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/02/02
- Re: Stats script for Postfix policy daemon, Brian Nelson, 2004/02/02
- Re: Stats script for Postfix policy daemon, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/02/02
- Re: Stats script for Postfix policy daemon, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/02/02
- Re: Stats script for Postfix policy daemon, Mark Lentczner, 2004/02/02
- Re: Stats script for Postfix policy daemon, Brian Nelson, 2004/02/03
- Re: Stats script for Postfix policy daemon, Mark Lentczner, 2004/02/03
New macro proposed %{u},
Dan Boresjo,
2004/02/02
- RE: New macro proposed %{u}, Julian Mehnle, 2004/02/02
- Re: New macro proposed %{u}, Wechsler, 2004/02/02
- RE: New macro proposed %{u}, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/02/02
- Re: New macro proposed %{u}, Dan Boresjo, 2004/02/02
- Re: New macro proposed %{u}, Philip Gladstone, 2004/02/02
- Re: New macro proposed %{u}, Dan Boresjo, 2004/02/02
- Re: New macro proposed %{u}, list+spf-discuss, 2004/02/04
- Re: New macro proposed %{u}, Dan Boresjo, 2004/02/04
- Re: New macro proposed %{u}, list+spf-discuss, 2004/02/05
- Re: New macro proposed %{u}, Phil Howard, 2004/02/04
- RE: New macro proposed %{u}, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/02/02
- RE: New macro proposed %{u}, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/02/03
- Re: New macro proposed %{u}, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/02/03
- RE: New macro proposed %{u}, Dustin D. Trammell, 2004/02/03
- RE: New macro proposed %{u}, Dustin D. Trammell, 2004/02/03
- RE: New macro proposed %{u}, Dustin D. Trammell, 2004/02/03
Re: "extreme SPF" scenario for ISPs,
Gustav Foseid,
2004/02/02
- Re: "extreme SPF" scenario for ISPs, rgreene(_at_)tclme(_dot_)org, 2004/02/02
- Re: "extreme SPF" scenario for ISPs, Matt Perry, 2004/02/02
- Re: Re: "extreme SPF" scenario for ISPs, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/02/02
- Re: Re: "extreme SPF" scenario for ISPs, Gustav Foseid, 2004/02/02
- Re: Re: "extreme SPF" scenario for ISPs, Phil Howard, 2004/02/02
- Re: Re: "extreme SPF" scenario for ISPs, John Warren, 2004/02/02
- RE: Re: "extreme SPF" scenario for ISPs, Seth Goodman, 2004/02/02
- Re: Re: "extreme SPF" scenario for ISPs, John Warren, 2004/02/02
- Re: Re: "extreme SPF" scenario for ISPs, David Brodbeck, 2004/02/02
- Re: Re: "extreme SPF" scenario for ISPs, John Warren, 2004/02/02
- RE: Re: "extreme SPF" scenario for ISPs, Julian Mehnle, 2004/02/03
- Re: Re: "extreme SPF" scenario for ISPs, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/02/03
- Re: Re: "extreme SPF" scenario for ISPs, David Brodbeck, 2004/02/03
- RE: Re: "extreme SPF" scenario for ISPs, John Warren, 2004/02/03
- Re: Re: "extreme SPF" scenario for ISPs, Gustav Foseid, 2004/02/03
- Re: Re: "extreme SPF" scenario for ISPs, johnc-lists, 2004/02/03
- Re: Re: "extreme SPF" scenario for ISPs, Gustav Foseid, 2004/02/03
- Re: Re: "extreme SPF" scenario for ISPs, johnc-lists, 2004/02/03
- Re: Re: "extreme SPF" scenario for ISPs, Jan Wildeboer, 2004/02/03
- Re: Re: "extreme SPF" scenario for ISPs, Gustav Foseid, 2004/02/03
- Re: Re: "extreme SPF" scenario for ISPs, johnc-lists, 2004/02/03
- Re: Re: "extreme SPF" scenario for ISPs, Gustav Foseid, 2004/02/03
- RE: Re: "extreme SPF" scenario for ISPs, Seth Goodman, 2004/02/03
- RE: Re: "extreme SPF" scenario for ISPs, David Brodbeck, 2004/02/03
- RE: Re: "extreme SPF" scenario for ISPs, Seth Goodman, 2004/02/03
- Re: Re: "extreme SPF" scenario for ISPs: AOL, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/02/03
- RE: Re: "extreme SPF" scenario for ISPs: AOL, Seth Goodman, 2004/02/03
- Re: Re: "extreme SPF" scenario for ISPs: AOL, wayne, 2004/02/03
- Re: Re: "extreme SPF" scenario for ISPs: AOL, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/02/04
- Re: Re: "extreme SPF" scenario for ISPs: AOL, Matthew Barr, 2004/02/04
- Re: Re: "extreme SPF" scenario for ISPs: AOL, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/02/04
- Re: Re: "extreme SPF" scenario for ISPs, David Brodbeck, 2004/02/03
- Re: "extreme SPF" scenario for ISPs, Matt Perry, 2004/02/03
- Re: Re: "extreme SPF" scenario for ISPs, David Brodbeck, 2004/02/03
- Re: Re: "extreme SPF" scenario for ISPs, Andy Bakun, 2004/02/03
- Re: Re: "extreme SPF" scenario for ISPs, Jan Wildeboer, 2004/02/03
- Re: Re: "extreme SPF" scenario for ISPs, Christophe Saout, 2004/02/03
- Re: Re: "extreme SPF" scenario for ISPs, Jan Wildeboer, 2004/02/03
- Re: Re: "extreme SPF" scenario for ISPs, John Warren, 2004/02/05
- RE: Re: "extreme SPF" scenario for ISPs, Seth Goodman, 2004/02/05
- Re: Re: "extreme SPF" scenario for ISPs, David Brodbeck, 2004/02/03
- Re: Re: "extreme SPF" scenario for ISPs, Christophe Saout, 2004/02/03
- Re: Re: "extreme SPF" scenario for ISPs, John Warren, 2004/02/05
- Re: Re: "extreme SPF" scenario for ISPs, Mark, 2004/02/03
- Re: Re: "extreme SPF" scenario for ISPs, johnc-lists, 2004/02/03
- Re: Re: "extreme SPF" scenario for ISPs, Mark, 2004/02/03
- Re: Re: "extreme SPF" scenario for ISPs, George Mitchell, 2004/02/03
- Re: Re: "extreme SPF" scenario for ISPs, rgreene(_at_)tclme(_dot_)org, 2004/02/03
- Re: Re: "extreme SPF" scenario for ISPs, George Mitchell, 2004/02/03
- Re: Re: "extreme SPF" scenario for ISPs, Thomas Harold, 2004/02/04
- RE: Re: "extreme SPF" scenario for ISPs, David Brodbeck, 2004/02/03
- Re: Re: "extreme SPF" scenario for ISPs, Dan Boresjo, 2004/02/02
- Re: Re: "extreme SPF" scenario for ISPs, John Warren, 2004/02/02
- Re: Re: "extreme SPF" scenario for ISPs, Dan Boresjo, 2004/02/02
- Re: Re: "extreme SPF" scenario for ISPs, John Warren, 2004/02/03
- Re: Re: "extreme SPF" scenario for ISPs, Dan Boresjo, 2004/02/03
- Re: Re: "extreme SPF" scenario for ISPs, Gustav Foseid, 2004/02/03
- Re: Re: "extreme SPF" scenario for ISPs, John Warren, 2004/02/03
- Re: Re: "extreme SPF" scenario for ISPs, Mark, 2004/02/02
- RE: Re: "extreme SPF" scenario for ISPs, Dustin D. Trammell, 2004/02/03
- RE: Re: "extreme SPF" scenario for ISPs, Dustin D. Trammell, 2004/02/03
- RE: Re: "extreme SPF" scenario for ISPs, Dustin D. Trammell, 2004/02/03
- RE: Re: "extreme SPF" scenario for ISPs, Dustin D. Trammell, 2004/02/03
- RE: Re: "extreme SPF" scenario for ISPs, Dustin D. Trammell, 2004/02/03
- RE: Re: "extreme SPF" scenario for ISPs, Dustin D. Trammell, 2004/02/03
RE: Is Return-Path as available as we think?,
Arik Baratz,
2004/02/01
- RE: Is Return-Path as available as we think?, Julian Mehnle, 2004/02/01
- RE: Is Return-Path as available as we think?, Arik Baratz, 2004/02/02
- Re: Is Return-Path as available as we think?, wayne, 2004/02/02
- Re: Is Return-Path as available as we think?, Justin Mason, 2004/02/02
- Re: Is Return-Path as available as we think?, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/02/02
- Re: Is Return-Path as available as we think?, Justin Mason, 2004/02/02
- Re: Is Return-Path as available as we think?, Roy Badami, 2004/02/03
- Re: Is Return-Path as available as we think?, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/02/03
- Re: Is Return-Path as available as we think?, wayne, 2004/02/03
- Re: Is Return-Path as available as we think?, Roy Badami, 2004/02/03
- Re: Is Return-Path as available as we think?, wayne, 2004/02/03
- Re: Is Return-Path as available as we think?, Roy Badami, 2004/02/03
- Re: Is Return-Path as available as we think?, Roy Badami, 2004/02/03
- RE: Is Return-Path as available as we think?, Julian Mehnle, 2004/02/02
- Re: Is Return-Path as available as we think?, Justin Mason, 2004/02/02
- RE: Is Return-Path as available as we think?, Julian Mehnle, 2004/02/02
- RE: Is Return-Path as available as we think?, Greg Connor, 2004/02/05
- RE: Is Return-Path as available as we think?, Arik Baratz, 2004/02/03
- RE: Is Return-Path as available as we think?, Arik Baratz, 2004/02/05
- Re: Is Return-Path as available as we think?, David A. Wheeler, 2004/02/05