Process is the wrong level in any case, you want user account.
If you want to do this you should go to domain keys or smime. Same answer if
you want to have robust mua filtering when opening a month old email.
The macro scheme is where a lot of consumer resistance is hit amongst
developers and big isps. In particular macros that require protocol actions
are going to be highly unpopular.
-----Original Message-----
From: Andy Bakun [mailto:spf(_at_)leave-it-to-grace(_dot_)com]
Sent: Tue Feb 03 08:51:08 2004
To: spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
Subject: Re: [spf-discuss] New macro proposed %{u}
On Tue, 2004-02-03 at 08:43, Dan Boresjo wrote:
SPF is supposed to be more selective than that, by authorizing clients on
a
per-domain basis.
Yes, for values of clients equal to "machines" or "IP addresses", not
values of clients equal to "processes".
--
Andy Bakun: it's organic
<abakun(_at_)thwartedefforts(_dot_)org>
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.5.txt
Wiki: http://spfwiki.infinitepenguins.net/pmwiki.php/SenderPermittedFrom/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.5.txt
Wiki: http://spfwiki.infinitepenguins.net/pmwiki.php/SenderPermittedFrom/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡