On Feb 10, 2004, at 5:21 PM, Meng Weng Wong wrote:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 05:20:55PM -0500, George Schlossnagle wrote:
|
| Question 2: when using an obfuscated version of the entire original
| address (specifically when it is unrecoverable by a recipient as per
| the db-based scheme), how do you not run afoul of the routing
| information requirement in CAN-SPAM?
|
The SRS implementation at Pobox will prepend
Old-Return-Path:
to show the original sender address.
We also prepend
Delivered-To: alias(_at_)pobox(_dot_)com
to indicate what caused the forwarding.
I don't have all my thoughts straight on the matter, but section
1037.d.2 seems worrisome to me:
`(2) MATERIALLY- For purposes of paragraphs (3) and (4) of subsection
(a), header information or registration information is materially
falsified if it is altered or concealed in a manner that would impair
the ability of a recipient of the message, an Internet access service
processing the message on behalf of a recipient, a person alleging a
violation of this section, or a law enforcement agency to identify,
locate, or respond to a person who initiated the electronic mail
message or to investigate the alleged violation.
header information seems to specifically include the MAIL FROM:.
I didn't right the law and I'm not a lawyer.
George