On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 10:33:20PM +0100, Daniel Roethlisberger wrote:
| Getting the concept of return path rewriting widely adopted should be
| more important. A solid SRS specification, along with mature reference
| implementations might help...
OK, I'll work on that next. I believe Shevek is done with the latest
round of changes.
What do you think of the new Mail::SRS algorithm?
http://www.anarres.org/projects/srs/
If you approve we can use that as the basis of a new SRS spec.
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/spf-draft-20040209.txt
Wiki: http://spfwiki.infinitepenguins.net/pmwiki.php/SenderPermittedFrom/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡