On Feb 10, 2004, at 5:08 PM, Meng Weng Wong wrote:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 05:02:04PM -0500, George Schlossnagle wrote:
| >
| >What do you think of the new Mail::SRS algorithm?
|
| How does this reconcile the reverse-path size limitations imposed by
| rfc2821?
|
Question 2: when using an obfuscated version of the entire original
address (specifically when it is unrecoverable by a recipient as per
the db-based scheme), how do you not run afoul of the routing
information requirement in CAN-SPAM?
// George Schlossnagle
// Postal Engine -- http://www.postalengine.com/
// Ecelerity: fastest MTA on earth