On Feb 10, 2004, at 4:43 PM, Meng Weng Wong wrote:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 10:33:20PM +0100, Daniel Roethlisberger wrote:
| Getting the concept of return path rewriting widely adopted should be
| more important. A solid SRS specification, along with mature
reference
| implementations might help...
OK, I'll work on that next. I believe Shevek is done with the latest
round of changes.
What do you think of the new Mail::SRS algorithm?
How does this reconcile the reverse-path size limitations imposed by
rfc2821?
George
// George Schlossnagle
// Postal Engine -- http://www.postalengine.com/
// Ecelerity: fastest MTA on earth