Re: Re: SRS and the 64 char limit

On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 05:57:59PM -0800, James Couzens wrote:
> SHA is bound to be larger?  (6 bytes per hash?)  Is there sufficient
> reason to not go with base64 encoded MD5 hash?  
As it has been pointed out before a few times: you cannot use base 64
in email addresses.  

Mate

-- 
---
Mate Wierdl | Dept. of Math. Sciences | University of Memphis  
Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.
See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html