spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Re: "extreme SPF" scenario for ISPs

2004-02-03 13:00:35

George Mitchell said:
I am the administrator for an email server interested in
implementing
SPF on my system.  I signed up for this list two days ago because I
assumed there would be around ten messages per day with helpful
hints
for achieving this goal.  And there are.

But they're being drowned out by this political discussion which
has digressed into port blocking, registering servers, etc., etc.
I'm just a humble newbie, but could you please take this whole
thread
somewhere more appropriate?  Let's PLEASE get on with talking about
IMPLEMENTING AND ADOPTING SPF!            -- George Mitchell


Welcome to the community, George.

If you have question about implimentation or adoption, please ask. 
As for politics...  Well, it could be split to a new list, but its
not mine to decide.  For now, its easy to filter.  Maybe the list
admin(s) will respond to your request and create a separate
spf-politics list.  Personally, at this stage in development, I
can't keep politics out of the implimentation considerations.

-- 
Bob Greene

-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.5.txt
Wiki: http://spfwiki.infinitepenguins.net/pmwiki.php/SenderPermittedFrom/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)½§Åv¼ð¦ç?2b¥yÈbox(_dot_)com