On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 04:07:54PM -0500, George Schlossnagle wrote:
|
| I also think that pushing for direct incorporation is probably not a
| winning strategy at this moment. With SPF in it's infancy, an
| unpublished RFC, and a young reference implementation, I think that MTA
| maintainers will be justifiably skeptical over whether to incorporate
| SPF into the core of their application.
Thank you all for your input. I, for one, now have a better sense of
what to focus on. This has been very helpful.
| There's also a bit of a 'my way or the highway' attitude floating
| around this list. That can be really counterproductive when you're
| trying to get your technology adopted or incorporated into other
| people's products.
I apologize for any part I may have had in this. If we're going to move
toward Working Group status we're all going to need to be a bit more
professional. We're all on the same side against the spammers and
sometimes we need to be reminded of that.
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/spf-draft-20040209.txt
Wiki: http://spfwiki.infinitepenguins.net/pmwiki.php/SenderPermittedFrom/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡