RE: will resistant MTAs be fronted with commercial antispam gateways?

I know it probably get's asked on a regular basis, but has anyone gotten
an opinion from a Microsoft Person on this technique?  What does the
Vole think?

N 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
[mailto:owner-spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com] On Behalf Of Richard 
Bollinger
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 4:52 PM
To: spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
Subject: Re: [spf-discuss] will resistant MTAs be fronted with
commercial antispam gateways? 

----- Original Message -----
From: "Justin Mason" <jm(_at_)jmason(_dot_)org>
...SpamAssassin does ;)   in the dev tree currently.

So... anyone know to you turn it on?  I don't see anything in the CVS
version which refer to SPF... just functions to evaluate spf in
lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/EvalTests.pm

-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/ Archives at
http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/spf-draft-20040209.txt
Wiki:
http://spfwiki.infinitepenguins.net/pmwiki.php/SenderPermittedFrom/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription, please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)½§Åv¼ð¦¾Øß´ëù11{W]?Ú