spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Suspicious:Re: [Announce] qmail SPF patch (pre1)

2004-02-05 16:51:22
On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 11:14:37AM -0600, Dustin D. Trammell wrote:

So far mine has not gotten any SPF fails (at least that did not get
encapsulated by SpamAssassin also, makes them hard to filter on),
however I have gotten two explicit SPF passes, one from livejournal.com
and one from gamefly.com.  It would be nice to have this implementation
be able to set/unset environment variables on the various results of the
SPF check, so that I could unset QMAILQUEUE on explicit SPF pass or fail
and bypass the spam filters.

If you are bypassing the spam filters, then spammer(_at_)spamdomain(_dot_)biz 
will
not be filtered when it publishes "v=spf1 +all", would it?

What's your intention?  Are you going to use blacklists to block them or
do you want to receive that spam?

puzzled,
Alex
-- 
begin  sig
http://www.googlism.com/index.htm?ism=alex+van+den+bogaerdt&type=1
This message was produced without any <iframe tags

-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.5.txt
Wiki: http://spfwiki.infinitepenguins.net/pmwiki.php/SenderPermittedFrom/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>