RE: Suspicious:Re: [Announce] qmail SPF patch (pre1)

Alex van den Bogaerdt wrote:
> If you are bypassing the spam filters, then spammer(_at_)spamdomain(_dot_)biz
> will not be filtered when it publishes "v=spf1 +all", would it?
>
> What's your intention?  Are you going to use blacklists to block them
> or do you want to receive that spam?
It's purely for temporary sorting and tracking.  I just enabled SPF on
my MTA and I want to see what kind of results it's getting.  Right now,
I just want to see ALL messages that either explicitly pass or fail SPF
so I can analyze them.  Eventually I'll be dropping connections that
fail and probably passing anything else to the spam filters for
processing.  The reason I want to bypass them temporarily is because
SpamAssassin likes to attach the original message to a new message it
generates, thus making it fairly hard for my MUA to filter on the
attached message's headers (I'm using Evolution, anyone know how to do
this?).

---
Dustin D. Trammell
Vulnerability Remediation Alchemist
Citadel Security Software, Inc.

-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.5.txt
Wiki: http://spfwiki.infinitepenguins.net/pmwiki.php/SenderPermittedFrom/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)½§Åv¼ð¦¾Øß´ëù1Ií-»Fqx(_dot_)com