spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: More on Philosophy of SPF

2004-02-24 04:00:38

[note:  this is thread has drift away from anything to do with SRS and
back to SPF stuff.  Followups have been set.)

In <20040224095420(_dot_)GC4143(_at_)uk(_dot_)tiscali(_dot_)com> Brian Candler 
<B(_dot_)Candler(_at_)pobox(_dot_)com> writes:

Right. So how does validating the HELO name help anyone then? After all,
it's not used as part of the delivery process.

When a bounce is being sent via a MAIL FROM:<>, it is the MTA that is
sending the email, not a person.  Therefore, SPF needs to validate the
domain name of the SMTP client, which is supplied by the HELO/EHLO
command. 


OTOH, validating the HELO name risks that you lose valid bounces, just
because the HELO name does not match your "policy".

I guess that all depends on what you mean by a "valid bounce".  If the
MTA is claiming to be some domain that it isn't, I'm not sure I
consider it to be valid.


-wayne


-------
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=srs-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: More on Philosophy of SPF, wayne <=