spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Some SPF concerns/questions

2004-02-07 09:54:44
Quoting wayne (wayne(_at_)midwestcs(_dot_)com):
In <20040206035452(_dot_)GN1323(_at_)dumbo(_dot_)pobox(_dot_)com> Meng Weng 
Wong <mengwong(_at_)dumbo(_dot_)pobox(_dot_)com> writes:

Firstly, a HELO with no FQDN is an instant ticket into most spamboxes.
Ditto for a HELO with no A or MX record.

Hmmm... I seem to recall this being discussed before, and significant
number of emails arrive with bogus HELO strings.  Either they aren't
FQDN, or they don't have A/MX records.

Are you sure that bad HELO strings are an instant ticket to most
spamboxes?


Bogus helo/ehlo is common practice.  Thestreet.com helos with Wendy.
Most small businesses with Exchange servers helo with the lan or
netbios name.

John Capo

-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.5.txt
Wiki: http://spfwiki.infinitepenguins.net/pmwiki.php/SenderPermittedFrom/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>