-----Original Message-----
From: Greg Connor [mailto:gconnor(_at_)nekodojo(_dot_)org]
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 9:51 AM
From: Julian Mehnle [mailto:lists(_at_)mehnle(_dot_)net]
Maybe we should start looking for and listing MTAs that are *not*
compliant.
--Arik Baratz <arikb(_at_)vidius(_dot_)co(_dot_)il> wrote:
Well, I was geared towards doing just that, but I didn't get a single
report of an MTA's non-compliance yet.
This was the situation where I couldn't see it:
Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2657.72
Exchange version is 5.5 something
Reading mail via IMAP
Client is Mulberry v2.2.1
I seem to recall that the Outlook "View Options" when directly connected
via native exchange protocol didn't show it either but don't quote me on
that. I'll try to verify tomorrow and see if I can get the exact exchange
version from our current exchange weenie.
I tested it with Exchange 5.5 SP4, and Outlook didn't show that header, I'd be
happy to hear your report.
-- Arik
**********************************************************************
This email and attachments have been scanned for
potential proprietary or sensitive information leakage.
PortAuthority(TM) Server
Keeping Information Inside
Vidius, Inc.
www.vidius.com
**********************************************************************
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.5.txt
Wiki: http://spfwiki.infinitepenguins.net/pmwiki.php/SenderPermittedFrom/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)½§Åv¼ð¦¾Øß´ë ù1Ií-»Fqx(_dot_)com