On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 11:39:44AM +0000, Mark wrote:
N.B. To avoid being listed as RFC ignorant, I will exempt postmaster@
and abuse@ from SES checks.
Why do you think you are in risk of being listed?
I want to allow empty envelope probes against postmaster@ and abuse@, just
in case an RFC ignorant probe decides that this is how they will check for
their existence. Just to be on the safe side. ;)
Clear.
In theory, when you are explicit on _why_ you reject a connection, rfci should
not list you.
mail from:<>
rcpt to:<postmaster(_at_)yourdomain>
55x I am SES protected. This is not a valid bounce. See http://....
the next probe [c|sh]ould be:
mail from:<postmaster(_at_)checkingdomain>
rcpt to:<postmaster(_at_)yourdomain>
220 Go ahead
Of course: http://www.gmi.edu/~jhuggins/humor/theory.html
cheers,
Alex
--
begin sig
http://www.googlism.com/index.htm?ism=alex+van+den+bogaerdt&type=1
This message was produced without any <iframe tags