----- Original Message -----
From: "Alex van den Bogaerdt" <alex(_at_)ergens(_dot_)op(_dot_)het(_dot_)net>
To: <spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com>
Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2004 12:21 PM
Subject: Re: [spf-discuss] Signed Envelope Sender: SRS on steroids
On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 03:30:03AM +0000, Mark wrote:
N.B. To avoid being listed as RFC ignorant, I will exempt postmaster@
and abuse@ from SES checks.
Why do you think you are in risk of being listed?
I want to allow empty envelope probes against postmaster@ and abuse@, just
in case an RFC ignorant probe decides that this is how they will check for
their existence. Just to be on the safe side. ;)
- Mark
System Administrator Asarian-host.org
---
"If you were supposed to understand it,
we wouldn't call it code." - FedEx