Re: cost comparison of Caller-ID, DK, and SPF

spf-discuss

Re: cost comparison of Caller-ID, DK, and SPF

2004-02-25 17:04:27

Justin Mason (jm(_at_)jmason(_dot_)org) wrote:

This added because DK hashes the message body, and some mailing list
software (MailMan for example, or this list) modifies the body, 
which will cause DK failures.


... and PGP/MIME signature failures.  And I'm not the only one.

-- 
Greg Wooledge                  |   "Truth belongs to everybody."
greg(_at_)wooledge(_dot_)org              |    - The Red Hot Chili Peppers
http://wooledge.org/~greg/     |

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: on moving from heuristics toward certainty, (continued) Re: on moving from heuristics toward certainty, David Woodhouse Re: on moving from heuristics toward certainty, wayne Re: on moving from heuristics toward certainty, Fridrik Skulason how the board might look a few moves ahead, Meng Weng Wong Re: how the board might look a few moves ahead, Meng Weng Wong Re: on moving from heuristics toward certainty, David Brodbeck Re: cost comparison of Caller-ID, DK, and SPF, wayne Re: cost comparison of Caller-ID, DK, and SPF, David Woodhouse Re: cost comparison of Caller-ID, DK, and SPF, wayne body hashing (was Re: cost comparison of Caller-ID, DK, and SPF), Justin Mason Re: cost comparison of Caller-ID, DK, and SPF, Greg Wooledge <= Re: cost comparison of Caller-ID, DK, and SPF, Roy Badami technical comparison, Caller-ID and SPF, Meng Weng Wong

Previous by Date:	Re: Why keep people thinking HELO checks provide a loophole?, Matthew Barr
Next by Date:	Re: Possible SPF machine-domain loophole???, Greg Connor
Previous by Thread:	body hashing (was Re: cost comparison of Caller-ID, DK, and SPF), Justin Mason
Next by Thread:	Re: cost comparison of Caller-ID, DK, and SPF, Roy Badami
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]