spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: SPF extension

2004-02-04 19:09:26
On Wed, 2004-02-04 at 19:57, Meng Weng Wong wrote:
Yuck.  This is a weakness of the current spec.  And if we're going to
add "or", we need "and", and soon we'll be on our way to longjmp() and
readmbox().

What's the rule, "all systems eventually become complex enough to detect
spam" or something like that, right?  "Any sufficently advanced system
is indistingushable from the FUSSP"?

-- 
Andy Bakun <spf(_at_)leave-it-to-grace(_dot_)com>

-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.5.txt
Wiki: http://spfwiki.infinitepenguins.net/pmwiki.php/SenderPermittedFrom/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>