spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: SPF extension

2004-02-04 18:46:22
On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 05:32:55PM -0800, Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:
| 
| You have convinced me that smime should be a mechanism.
| 
| But I still need to be convinved on domainsig. I suspect because
| it is really turning out to be an additional accreditation mechanism
| that also involves an authentication component.
| 

My understanding of Domain Keys is that it is purely an authentication
mechanism; if anyone can make up their own public/private keypairs,
accreditation has to come from somewhere else.

So we can do

  v=spf1 a mx dk:g=;t=rsa;k=_domainkey.%{d} -all accredit=_acc.%{d}

If by domainsig you mean something different, please rewind ...

-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.5.txt
Wiki: http://spfwiki.infinitepenguins.net/pmwiki.php/SenderPermittedFrom/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>