On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 01:09:00AM -0500, Meng Weng Wong wrote:
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.7.txt
This is the release candidate for what'll go into the Internet-Draft
archive.
Please take a look at it and tell me if you spot any problems.
I've found some I think. Some may be considered nitpicking:
2.
BNF of SPF-record is wrong
2.2.2
Clients are NOT REQUIRED to fall back ...
... clients MUST NOT ....
IMHO the meaning of "are NOT REQUIRED to" and "MUST NOT" is different.
"not required" implicates it is optional. "must not" is forbidden.
Perhaps "are NOT REQUIRED to" should read "MUST NOT".
3.1
I'm not happy with the way versions are described. Technically speaking
"v=spf1+ext" is not SPF (space separated words, "+ext1" does not match
*DIGIT)
and while the last line of this paragraph attempts to say this, it is not
clear.
3.2
So mechanism "mx:/" is valid? In 4.7, cidr speaks about "1*DIGIT" to
indicate
at least one digit should follow the slash. Omitting this here indicates it
is
valid syntax.
4.1
``Mechanisms after "all" will never be tested.'' but will modifiers?
What would "v=spf1 a -all redirect=..." do ? (see 5.1)
Appendix A
BNF of version is incorrect
Appendix B2
Example.org is listed three times, should read example.{org|net|com}
cheers,
Alex
--
begin sig
http://www.googlism.com/index.htm?ism=alex+van+den+bogaerdt&type=1
This message was produced without any <iframe tags
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.7.txt
Wiki: http://spfwiki.infinitepenguins.net/pmwiki.php/SenderPermittedFrom/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡