On 15 Feb 2004 at 12:52, Tim Wilde wrote:
On Sun, 15 Feb 2004, Shevek wrote:
They ought to be using VRFY. Something is very messed up here.
That's all well and good, but we live in a world where EXPN and VRFY are
disabled by default because spammers use them for that exact same purpose.
Yet one more reason why we need something like a IMX record. That way
you would only a request come from a MX or IMX server.
--
Tim Wilde
twilde(_at_)dyndns(_dot_)org
Systems Administrator
Dynamic Network Services, Inc.
http://www.dyndns.org/
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/spf-draft-20040209.txt
Wiki: http://spfwiki.infinitepenguins.net/pmwiki.php/SenderPermittedFrom/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡
----------------------------------------------------------------------
John Warren, President | Tel.: +1 714-573-9650
Warren Engineering | Fax: +1 714-573-9289
14681 Danborough Rd. |
mailto:jwarren(_at_)wenet(_dot_)tustin(_dot_)ca(_dot_)us
Tustin, CA 92780-6755 |
mailto:info(_at_)wenet(_dot_)tustin(_dot_)ca(_dot_)us
| http:Someday.com
+--------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Any and all use of my email address for bulk email without my |
| expressed permission is prohibited. This means NO JUNK EMAIL, SPAM.|
| Support the anti-Spam amendment, Join at http://www.cauce.org/ |
+--------------------------------------------------------------------+