In <20040224161252(_dot_)GV27676(_at_)dumbo(_dot_)pobox(_dot_)com> Meng Weng
Wong <mengwong(_at_)dumbo(_dot_)pobox(_dot_)com> writes:
| > I think it my be useful to do SPF checking on the HELO string, and
| > reject the connection if the SPF check fails, but let it pass
| > otherwise.
|
| That was my idea too. I have no problem with bad HELO strings from
I am very tempted to put this into the RFC but maybe it better belongs
in a BCP or in the website "how-to" document. What do people think?
My knee-jerk reaction is that it would be a good thing to add to the
RFC. I reserve the right to flip-flop though. ;->
Either way, I need to do a paper on "what the RFC doesn't tell you".
Covering trusted-forwarder, the deployment strategy, setup instructions,
per-MX configuration, etc.
And best-guess...
-wayne