"John Warren" <john(_at_)wenet(_dot_)tustin(_dot_)ca(_dot_)us> writes:
And it's the last think I want to see but if the ISP don't solve the
problem with direct to MX spam then someone has to force them too.
Fines do a darn good job doing that. Remember that we are not asking
the ISP to do something that is not an Internet standard. Their is a
RFC for MSAs. What we are asking is that the ISP follow that RFC and
once done shutdown the use of port 25 by any system not registered with
the ISP as a MSA or MTA.
Should it be up to the receiving SMTP server or the senders ISP to
decide whether or not mail from "non servers" (whatever _that_ means)
should be accepted?
Is it correct for ISPs to ban their users from using an authenticated
SMPT server outside of their network?
--
Gustav Foseid, Initio IT-løsninger AS
http://www.initio.no/
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.5.txt
Wiki: http://spfwiki.infinitepenguins.net/pmwiki.php/SenderPermittedFrom/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)½§Åv¼ð¦ç?2b¥yÈbox(_dot_)com