spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: FAQ updates needed

2004-03-17 18:24:10
In 
<16472(_dot_)55170(_dot_)642333(_dot_)745231(_at_)notabene(_dot_)cse(_dot_)unsw(_dot_)edu(_dot_)au>
 Neil Brown <neilb(_at_)cse(_dot_)unsw(_dot_)edu(_dot_)au> writes:

2/ 
      Whoa, that's an underscore in _spf.

I assume this section relates to an earlier design, and should be
removed.


Yes, that relates to a (much) earlier version of the spec, but who
knows, the IETF may want to bring it back.  (There are people who feel
very strongly about stuff like this.  I'm not one of them, but I'm not
that active in the IETF either.)



-wayne


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>