wayne wrote:
I was interessed in SPF because it is very simple. And because it was
possible for me to implement the parts that were not implemented (I
have written the sendmail-patch for libspf and I have corrected many
bugs in libspf). And now I have exactly that what I want and what I
need.
I dunno if you checked it out first, but libspf-alt has far fewer bugs
than libspf. See: http://libspf2.org
I did not check what happended the last few months with libspf-alt. But
at the time I started to program the patch for libspf there were two
different concepts behind libspf and libspf-alt. The one was a library
and the other was a deamon (even if it was called library). The deamon
for me was a KO-criteria. So I have choosen libspf. Point.
If libspf or libspf-alt has more or fewer bugs, I defenatly do NOT care
about this. I'm only interessed in a working solution. And If I find any
bugs I correct them (in libspf, because I started to work with this
months ago).
And by the way: could everyone tell me please, why there is a war
between libspf.org and libspf2.org? For me this seams to be stupid and
headless. I think here we have to work together and not against each other.
Teddy