SPF Discuss (thread)
Clarification of %{p} macro & 4.6 Ptr validated domain resolution,
Gary Levell,
2004/06/29
- Re: Clarification of %{p} macro & 4.6 Ptr validated domain resolution, Roger Moser, 2004/06/30
- RE: Clarification of %{p} macro & 4.6 Ptr validated domain resolution, Gary Levell, 2004/06/30
- RE: Clarification of %{p} macro & 4.6 Ptr validated domain resolution, Gary Levell, 2004/06/30
- RE: Clarification of %{p} macro & 4.6 Ptr validated domain resolution, Gary Levell, 2004/06/30
- RE: Clarification of %{p} macro & 4.6 Ptr validated domain resolution, Gary Levell, 2004/06/30
Win NT,
Kevin Peuhkurinen,
2004/06/29
What does PASS really mean?,
Jonathan Gardner,
2004/06/29
- Re: What does PASS really mean?, Guillaume Filion, 2004/06/29
- RE: What does PASS really mean?, spf, 2004/06/29
- Re: What does PASS really mean?, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/06/29
- Security leak in spf-* lists?, Chris Haynes, 2004/06/30
- Re: Security leak in spf-* lists?, Paul Howarth, 2004/06/30
- Re: Security leak in spf-* lists?, Karl Prince, 2004/06/30
- RE: What does PASS really mean?, spf, 2004/06/30
- Re: What does PASS really mean?, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/06/30
- RE: What does PASS really mean?, spf, 2004/06/30
- Re: What does PASS really mean?, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/06/30
- RE: What does PASS really mean?, spf, 2004/06/30
- RE: What does PASS really mean?, spf, 2004/06/30
- wizard.html problems (was: What does PASS really mean?), Frank Ellermann, 2004/06/30
- RE: wizard.html problems (was: What does PASS really mean?), spf, 2004/06/30
- Re[2]: What does PASS really mean?, Chris Drake, 2004/06/30
- Re: What does PASS really mean?, Chris Haynes, 2004/06/29
- Re: What does PASS really mean?, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/06/29
- RE: What does PASS really mean?, Gary Levell, 2004/06/29
Software is Buggy and Immature!,
David Lawless,
2004/06/28
- Re: Software is Buggy and Immature!, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/06/28
- Re: Software is Buggy and Immature!, Jeffrey Goldberg, 2004/06/28
- Re: Software is Buggy and Immature!, Paul Howarth, 2004/06/28
- Re: Software is Buggy and Immature!, Shevek, 2004/06/29
- Re: Software is Buggy and Immature!, Paul Howarth, 2004/06/29
- Re: Software is Buggy and Immature!, wayne, 2004/06/29
- Re: Software is Buggy and Immature!, Shevek, 2004/06/29
- Re: Software is Buggy and Immature!, Paul Howarth, 2004/06/30
- Re: Suggestions and Ideas, James Couzens, 2004/06/30
- Re: Suggestions and Ideas, Paul Howarth, 2004/06/30
- Re: Software is Buggy and Immature!, Paul Bissex, 2004/06/29
- Software is Buggy and Immature!, David Lawless, 2004/06/29
ANNOUNCE: libspf v1.0 RELEASE CANDIDATE 2,
James Couzens,
2004/06/27
- Re: ANNOUNCE: libspf v1.0 RELEASE CANDIDATE 2, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/06/27
- Re: ANNOUNCE: libspf v1.0 RELEASE CANDIDATE 2, Michael Weiner, 2004/06/27
- libspf2.org - Returned mail: see transcript for details, Chris Drake, 2004/06/28
- RE: libspf2.org - Returned mail: see transcript for details, Michael R. Brumm, 2004/06/28
- RE: libspf2.org - Returned mail: see transcript for details, James Couzens, 2004/06/28
- RE: libspf2.org - Returned mail: see transcript fordetails, Michael R. Brumm, 2004/06/28
- Re: libspf2.org - Returned mail: see transcript for details, Shevek, 2004/06/28
- Re: libspf2.org - Returned mail: see transcript for details, Franz J Ehrengruber (iptelenet), 2004/06/28
AOL rejecting hosts with no rDNS?,
systhine,
2004/06/24
- Re: AOL rejecting hosts with no rDNS?, Carl Hutzler, 2004/06/24
- Re: AOL rejecting hosts with no rDNS?, Jason Gurtz, 2004/06/24
- Re: AOL rejecting hosts with no rDNS?, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/06/24
- AOL's impatient servers (was: Re: AOL rejecting hosts with no rDNS?), David Brodbeck, 2004/06/24
- Re: AOL's impatient servers, Frank Ellermann, 2004/06/24
- Re: Re: AOL's impatient servers, David Brodbeck, 2004/06/25
- Re: AOL's impatient servers (was: Re: AOL rejecting hosts with no rDNS?), Tim Meadowcroft, 2004/06/26
- Re: AOL's impatient servers (was: Re: AOL rejecting hosts with no rDNS?), David Brodbeck, 2004/06/28
- Re: AOL's impatient servers, Roger Moser, 2004/06/28
- Re: Re: AOL's impatient servers, John Keown, 2004/06/28
- Re: Re: AOL's impatient servers, Alan Hodgson, 2004/06/28
- Re: Re: AOL's impatient servers, David Brodbeck, 2004/06/28
- spammers are welcome on this mailing list, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/06/28
- Re: AOL rejecting hosts with no rDNS?, David Brodbeck, 2004/06/24
- Re: AOL rejecting hosts with no rDNS?, Carl Hutzler, 2004/06/24
- RE: AOL rejecting hosts with no rDNS?, Steven Foster, 2004/06/25
- Re: AOL rejecting hosts with no rDNS?, Chuck Mead, 2004/06/25
- Re: AOL rejecting hosts with no rDNS?, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2004/06/25
- Re: Re: AOL rejecting hosts with no rDNS?, Chuck Mead, 2004/06/25
- Re: Re: AOL rejecting hosts with no rDNS?, Ralf Doeblitz, 2004/06/25
- Re: Re: AOL rejecting hosts with no rDNS?, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2004/06/27
- Re: Re: Re: AOL rejecting hosts with no rDNS?, Xavier Beaudouin, 2004/06/28
- Re: AOL rejecting hosts with no rDNS?, Carl Hutzler, 2004/06/24
- Re: AOL rejecting hosts with no rDNS?, Andrew Church, 2004/06/24
- Re: AOL rejecting hosts with no rDNS?, Carl Hutzler, 2004/06/24
- Re: AOL rejecting hosts with no rDNS?, Andrew Church, 2004/06/24
- Re: AOL rejecting hosts with no rDNS?, Aredridel, 2004/06/24
- Re: AOL rejecting hosts with no rDNS?, David Brodbeck, 2004/06/25
- Unified SPF example: achurch.org, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/06/24
- Re: Unified SPF - new I-D, example: achurch.org, Matthew Elvey, 2004/06/25
- Re: Unified SPF - new I-D, example: achurch.org, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/06/28
- Re: AOL rejecting hosts with no rDNS?, wayne, 2004/06/24
- Re: AOL rejecting hosts with no rDNS?, Andrew Church, 2004/06/24
- Re: AOL rejecting hosts with no rDNS?, Jason Gurtz, 2004/06/24
- Re: AOL rejecting hosts with no rDNS?, Richard Parker, 2004/06/24
- Re: AOL rejecting hosts with no rDNS?, Jason Gurtz, 2004/06/25
- Re: AOL rejecting hosts with no rDNS?, Jason Gurtz, 2004/06/25
- Re: AOL rejecting hosts with no rDNS?, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/06/25
- Re: AOL rejecting hosts with no rDNS?, Xavier Beaudouin, 2004/06/25
- Re: AOL rejecting hosts with no rDNS?, Jason Gurtz, 2004/06/25
- Re: AOL rejecting hosts with no rDNS?, Xavier Beaudouin, 2004/06/25
- Re: AOL rejecting hosts with no rDNS?, Thomas Harold, 2004/06/25
- Re: AOL rejecting hosts with no rDNS?, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/06/25
- Re: AOL rejecting hosts with no rDNS?, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2004/06/27
- Re: Re: AOL rejecting hosts with no rDNS?, Greg Connor, 2004/06/27
- Re: AOL rejecting hosts with no rDNS?, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2004/06/28
- Re: AOL rejecting hosts with no rDNS?, George Mitchell, 2004/06/24
- Re: AOL rejecting hosts with no rDNS?, frank, 2004/06/24
- Re: AOL rejecting hosts with no rDNS?, Chuck Mead, 2004/06/24
- Re: AOL rejecting hosts with no rDNS?, Xavier Beaudouin, 2004/06/25
A proposal for IPv6 addresses in SPF,
Stephane Bortzmeyer,
2004/06/24
- RE: A proposal for IPv6 addresses in SPF, Gary Levell, 2004/06/24
- Re: A proposal for IPv6 addresses in SPF, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2004/06/24
- Possible New Mechanism Prefix, spf, 2004/06/24
- Re: Possible New Mechanism Prefix, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/06/24
- RE: Possible New Mechanism Prefix, spf, 2004/06/24
- Re: Possible New Mechanism Prefix, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/06/24
- RE: Possible New Mechanism Prefix, spf, 2004/06/24
- RE: Possible New Mechanism Prefix, Mark Shewmaker, 2004/06/24
- RE: Possible New Mechanism Prefix, spf, 2004/06/24
- Re: Possible New Mechanism Prefix, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/06/24
- RE: Possible New Mechanism Prefix, spf, 2004/06/24
- RE: Possible New Mechanism Prefix, Jesus Duarte, 2004/06/24
- RE: Possible New Mechanism Prefix, spf, 2004/06/24
- Re: Possible New Mechanism Prefix, Daniel Taylor, 2004/06/24
- RE: Possible New Mechanism Prefix, spf, 2004/06/25
- RE: (Not) Possible New Mechanism Prefix, spf, 2004/06/26
- Re: (Not) Possible New Mechanism Prefix, Frank Ellermann, 2004/06/27
- Why SOFTFAIL, wayne, 2004/06/27
- Re: Why SOFTFAIL, Chris Drake, 2004/06/27
- Re: Why SOFTFAIL, David Brodbeck, 2004/06/28
- Re: Why SOFTFAIL, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/06/28
- Re[2]: Why SOFTFAIL, Chris Drake, 2004/06/28
- Re: Re[2]: Why SOFTFAIL, David Brodbeck, 2004/06/29
- Re: Why SOFTFAIL, Frank Ellermann, 2004/06/28
- Re: (Not) Possible New Mechanism Prefix, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/06/28
- RE: (Not) Possible New Mechanism Prefix, spf, 2004/06/29
- Re: (Not) Possible New Mechanism Prefix, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/06/29
- Re: (Not) Possible New Mechanism Prefix, David Brodbeck, 2004/06/29
- RE: Possible New Mechanism Prefix, spf, 2004/06/25
- RE: Possible New Mechanism Prefix, Jon Kyme, 2004/06/25
- RE: Possible New Mechanism Prefix, spf, 2004/06/25
- RE: Possible New Mechanism Prefix, Mark Shewmaker, 2004/06/25
- RE: Possible New Mechanism Prefix, spf, 2004/06/25
- RE: Possible New Mechanism Prefix, Mark Shewmaker, 2004/06/25
- RE: Use of SPF with Shared MTAs (was Possible New Mechanism Prefix), spf, 2004/06/26
- RE: Use of SPF with Shared MTAs (was Possible New Mechanism Prefix), Mark Shewmaker, 2004/06/26
- RE: Use of SPF with Shared MTAs (was Possible New Mechanism Prefix), Michael R. Brumm, 2004/06/26
- RE: Use of SPF with Shared MTAs (was Possible New Mechanism Prefix), Seth Goodman, 2004/06/26
- RE: Use of SPF with Shared MTAs (was Possible New Mechanism Prefix), David Brodbeck, 2004/06/28
- RE: Use of SPF with Shared MTAs (was Possible New Mechanism Prefix), Seth Goodman, 2004/06/28
- RE: Use of SPF with Shared MTAs (was Possible New Mechanism Prefix), Mark Shewmaker, 2004/06/28
- Re: Possible New Mechanism Prefix, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/06/25
- Re: Possible New Mechanism Prefix, Hector Santos, 2004/06/26
spf-milter and memory,
Chris Miller,
2004/06/23
- Re: spf-milter and memory, Koen Martens, 2004/06/24
- Re: spf-milter and memory, Chris Miller, 2004/06/24
- Re: spf-milter and memory, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/06/24
- Re: spf-milter and memory, Chris Miller, 2004/06/24
- Re: spf-milter and memory, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/06/24
- Re: spf-milter and memory, Jeffrey Goldberg, 2004/06/24
- Re: spf-milter and memory, Ralf Doeblitz, 2004/06/24
- Re: spf-milter and memory, Koen Martens, 2004/06/26
Distributed reputation system project announcement,
Mark C. Langston,
2004/06/22
- Distributed reputation system; GOSSIP, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/06/23
- Re: Distributed reputation system; GOSSIP, Mark C. Langston, 2004/06/23
- Re: Distributed reputation system; GOSSIP, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/06/23
- Re: Distributed reputation system; GOSSIP, Mark C. Langston, 2004/06/23
- Re: Distributed reputation system; GOSSIP, Shevek, 2004/06/23
- Re: Distributed reputation system; GOSSIP, Mark C. Langston, 2004/06/23
- Re: Distributed reputation system; GOSSIP, Greg Connor, 2004/06/23
Indiustry Alliance Publish Anti-Spam Proposals,
Karl Prince,
2004/06/22
- RE: Indiustry Alliance Publish Anti-Spam Proposals, John Glube, 2004/06/22
- Re: Indiustry Alliance Publish Anti-Spam Proposals, Carl Hutzler, 2004/06/22
- RE: Indiustry Alliance Publish Anti-Spam Proposals, John Glube, 2004/06/22
- Re: Indiustry Alliance Publish Anti-Spam Proposals, Carl Hutzler, 2004/06/23
- RE: Indiustry Alliance Publish Anti-Spam Proposals, John Glube, 2004/06/23
- Re: Indiustry Alliance Publish Anti-Spam Proposals, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/06/24
- Re: Indiustry Alliance Publish Anti-Spam Proposals, John Keown, 2004/06/24
- Re: Indiustry Alliance Publish Anti-Spam Proposals, David Brodbeck, 2004/06/24
- Re: Indiustry Alliance Publish Anti-Spam Proposals, Carl Hutzler, 2004/06/24
- Re: Indiustry Alliance Publish Anti-Spam Proposals, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/06/25
- Re: Indiustry Alliance Publish Anti-Spam Proposals, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/06/22
RE: MAY vs SHOULD vs MUST,
Ryan Malayter,
2004/06/22
- RE: MAY vs SHOULD vs MUST, spf, 2004/06/22
- RE: MAY vs SHOULD vs MUST, Seth Goodman, 2004/06/22
- RE: MAY vs SHOULD vs MUST, Karl Prince, 2004/06/22
- Re: MAY vs SHOULD vs MUST, Larry Smith, 2004/06/22
- send money, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/06/22
- Re: send money, Michael Weiner, 2004/06/22
- Re: send money, Karl Prince, 2004/06/22
- Re: send money, Weldon Whipple, 2004/06/22
- Re: send money, wayne, 2004/06/22
- Re: send money, Michael Weiner, 2004/06/22
- Re: send money, Chris Drake, 2004/06/22
- Re: send money, Michael Weiner, 2004/06/22
- RE: send money, Steven Foster, 2004/06/23
- Re: send money, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/06/22
- Re: Meng's SPF wizard, Shevek, 2004/06/23
- Re: Meng's SPF wizard, Karl Prince, 2004/06/23
- Re: MAY vs SHOULD vs MUST, Jon Kyme, 2004/06/23
- RE: MAY vs SHOULD vs MUST, administrator, 2004/06/23
RE: Why XML,
terry,
2004/06/22
- Re: Why XML, Hadmut Danisch, 2004/06/22
- Re: Re: Why XML, Roger Moser, 2004/06/22
- Re: Re: Why XML, Tim Meadowcroft, 2004/06/22
- Re: Re: Why XML, Aredridel, 2004/06/22
- Re: Re: Why XML, Jon Kyme, 2004/06/23
- Re: Re: Why XML, David Brodbeck, 2004/06/23
- Re: Re: Why XML, Lars B. Dybdahl, 2004/06/23
- Re: Re: Why XML, David Brodbeck, 2004/06/23
- Re: Re: Why XML, Lars Dybdahl, 2004/06/23
- Re: Re: Why XML, Andy Bakun, 2004/06/26
- Re: Why XML, Douglas Otis, 2004/06/22
- Re: Why XML, Matthew Elvey, 2004/06/23
- Re: Why XML, Douglas Otis, 2004/06/23
- Re: Why XML, Matthew Elvey, 2004/06/25
- Let's stop discussing XML (Was: Why XML), wayne, 2004/06/26
- Re: Why XML, Douglas Otis, 2004/06/27
- RE: RE: Why XML, Ryan Malayter, 2004/06/22
- RE: Re: Why XML, Ryan Malayter, 2004/06/23
Informal request for comments (a new SMTP-CBV protocol),
Chris Drake,
2004/06/21
- Re: Informal request for comments (a new SMTP-CBV protocol), Tony Finch, 2004/06/21
- Re[2]: Informal request for comments (a new SMTP-CBV protocol), Chris Drake, 2004/06/21
- Re[2]: Informal request for comments (a new SMTP-CBV protocol), Tony Finch, 2004/06/22
- Re[3]: Informal request for comments (a new SMTP-CBV protocol), Chris Drake, 2004/06/22
- Re[3]: Informal request for comments (a new SMTP-CBV protocol), Tony Finch, 2004/06/23
- Re[4]: Informal request for comments (a new SMTP-CBV protocol), Chris Drake, 2004/06/24
- Re[4]: Informal request for comments (a new SMTP-CBV protocol), Tony Finch, 2004/06/24
- Re[5]: Informal request for comments (a new SMTP-CBV protocol), Chris Drake, 2004/06/25
overall paradigm shift in email, plus rambling philosophical discussion,
Meng Weng Wong,
2004/06/20
- Re: overall paradigm shift in email, plus rambling philosophical discussion, Chris Drake, 2004/06/20
- Re: overall paradigm shift in email, plus rambling philosophical discussion, Daniel Taylor, 2004/06/20
- Re: overall paradigm shift in email, plus rambling philosophical discussion, Koen Martens, 2004/06/20
- Re: overall paradigm shift in email, plus rambling philosophical discussion, Paul Howarth, 2004/06/21
- Re: overall paradigm shift in email, plus rambling philosophical discussion, Frank Ellermann, 2004/06/21
- Re: Re: overall paradigm shift in email, plus rambling philosophical discussion, Paul Howarth, 2004/06/21
- Re: overall paradigm shift in email, plus rambling philosophical discussion, Frank Ellermann, 2004/06/21
- Re: overall paradigm shift in email, plus rambling philosophical discussion, Jeffrey Goldberg, 2004/06/21
- Re: overall paradigm shift in email, plus rambling philosophical discussion, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/06/21
- Re: overall paradigm shift in email, plus rambling philosophical discussion, Jeffrey Goldberg, 2004/06/21
- Re: overall paradigm shift in email, plus rambling philosophical discussion, Koen Martens, 2004/06/20
- pobox.com per-user spf support, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/06/21
- Re: [SPAM][93%]overall paradigm shift in email, plus rambling philosophical discussion, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/06/21
- RE: overall paradigm shift in email, plus rambling philosophical discussion, John Glube, 2004/06/21
making the policy decision: leveraging HTTPS,
Meng Weng Wong,
2004/06/20
- Re: making the policy decision: leveraging HTTPS, Frank Ellermann, 2004/06/20
- Re: making the policy decision: leveraging HTTPS, list+spf-discuss, 2004/06/20
- Re: making the policy decision: leveraging HTTPS, David Brodbeck, 2004/06/20
- Re: making the policy decision: leveraging HTTPS, Olaf, 2004/06/21
- making the policy decision: leveraging HTTPS, Matthew Elvey, 2004/06/20
- Re: making the policy decision: leveraging HTTPS, Jon Kyme, 2004/06/21
a grand unified theory of MARID,
Meng Weng Wong,
2004/06/17
- Re: a grand unified theory of MARID, Steven Earl Smith, 2004/06/18
- RE: a grand unified theory of MARID, spf, 2004/06/18
- Re: a grand unified theory of MARID, Teddy, 2004/06/18
- Re: a grand unified theory of MARID, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/06/18
- Re: a grand unified theory of MARID, Teddy, 2004/06/18
- RE: a grand unified theory of MARID, John Glube, 2004/06/18
- Unified SPF: example with single domain, single machine, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/06/18
- RE: Unified SPF: example with single domain, single machine, John Glube, 2004/06/18
- Re: Unification theory and "layers", Greg Connor, 2004/06/19
- Re: Unification theory and "layers", Tony Finch, 2004/06/20
- Re: Unification theory and "layers", Greg Connor, 2004/06/20
- Re: Unification theory and "layers", Tony Finch, 2004/06/20
- Re: Unification theory and "layers", Greg Connor, 2004/06/20
- Re: Unification theory and "layers", Tony Finch, 2004/06/20
- Re: Unification theory and "layers", wayne, 2004/06/20
- Re: Unification theory and "layers", Rolf E. Sonneveld, 2004/06/21
- Re: Unification theory and, Karl Prince, 2004/06/21
- Re: Unification theory and "layers", wayne, 2004/06/20
- Re: Unification theory and "layers", wayne, 2004/06/20
- Re: Unification theory and "layers", Greg Connor, 2004/06/20
- RE: Unification theory and "layers", Seth Goodman, 2004/06/22
- Re: Unification theory and "layers", Matthew Elvey, 2004/06/25
- RE: Unification theory and "layers", Seth Goodman, 2004/06/26
- Unified SPF and "layers" & draft-ietf-marid-rationale-00.txt, Matthew Elvey, 2004/06/28
- Re: Unified SPF and "layers" & draft-ietf-marid-rationale-00.txt, Greg Connor, 2004/06/28
- Unified SPF: example with single domain, multiple machines, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/06/18
- Re: Unified SPF: example with single domain, multiple machines, william(at)elan.net, 2004/06/18
- Re: Unified SPF: example with single domain, multiple machines, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/06/18
- Re: Unified SPF: example with single domain, multiple machines, Frank Ellermann, 2004/06/18
- Re: Unified SPF: example with single domain, multiple machines, Koen Martens, 2004/06/18
- Unified SPF: Example for dialup ISP, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/06/18
- Message not available
- Re: Unified SPF: example with single domain, multiple machines, Karl Prince, 2004/06/18
- Re: Unified SPF: example with single domain, multiple machines, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/06/18
- Re: Unified SPF: example with single domain, multiple machines, Weldon Whipple, 2004/06/18
- Re: Unified SPF: example with single domain, multiple machines, list+spf-discuss, 2004/06/19
- Re: Unified SPF: example with single domain, multiple machines, Weldon Whipple, 2004/06/19
- Re: Unified SPF: example with single domain, multiple machines, Karl Prince, 2004/06/18
- Message not available
- Re: Unified SPF: Example for dialup ISP, Karl Prince, 2004/06/18
- implicit mx rule, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/06/18
- Re: implicit mx rule, Karl Prince, 2004/06/18
- Re: implicit mx rule, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/06/18
- Re: implicit mx rule, Karl Prince, 2004/06/18
- Re: implicit mx rule, Karl Prince, 2004/06/18
- Message not available
- Re: a grand unified theory of MARID, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/06/19
- Re: a grand unified theory of MARID, Karl Prince, 2004/06/20
FTC: we need sender authentication before "Do Not Spam" can work,
Meng Weng Wong,
2004/06/15
- Re: FTC: we need sender authentication before "Do Not Spam" can work, Lars Dybdahl, 2004/06/15
- RE: FTC: we need sender authentication before "Do Not Spam" can work, Seth Goodman, 2004/06/16
- Re: FTC: we need sender authentication before "Do Not Spam" can work, Lars Dybdahl, 2004/06/16
- RE: FTC: we need sender authentication before "Do Not Spam" can work, Seth Goodman, 2004/06/16
- RE: FTC: we need sender authentication before "Do Not Spam" can work, John Glube, 2004/06/16
- RE: FTC: we need sender authentication before "Do Not Spam" can work, Seth Goodman, 2004/06/16
- RE: FTC: we need sender authentication before "Do Not Spam" can work, John Glube, 2004/06/16
- Re: FTC: we need sender authentication before "Do Not Spam" can work, Koen Martens, 2004/06/17
- RE: FTC: we need sender authentication before "Do Not Spam" can work, John Glube, 2004/06/18
- Re: FTC: we need sender authentication before "Do Not Spam" can work, Paul Howarth, 2004/06/18
- RE: FTC: we need sender authentication before "Do Not Spam" can work, John Glube, 2004/06/18
- RE: FTC: we need sender authentication before "Do Not Spam" can work, Seth Goodman, 2004/06/17
- RE: FTC: we need sender authentication before "Do Not Spam" can work, David Brodbeck, 2004/06/17
- RE: FTC: we need sender authentication before "Do Not Spam" can work, John Glube, 2004/06/17
- RE: FTC: we need sender authentication before "Do Not Spam" can work, Seth Goodman, 2004/06/17
- RE: FTC: we need sender authentication before "Do Not Spam" can work, John Glube, 2004/06/17
- RE: FTC: we need sender authentication before "Do Not Spam" can work, David Brodbeck, 2004/06/18
- Re: FTC: we need sender authentication before "Do Not Spam" can work, Koen Martens, 2004/06/18
- Re: FTC: we need sender authentication before "Do Not Spam" can work, Paul Howarth, 2004/06/18
- RE: FTC: we need sender authentication before "Do Not Spam" can work, John Glube, 2004/06/18
- Re: FTC: we need sender authentication before "Do Not Spam" can work, Franz J Ehrengruber (iptelenet), 2004/06/17
- Re: FTC: we need sender authentication before "Do Not Spam" can work, Daniel Taylor, 2004/06/17
- RE: FTC: we need sender authentication before "Do Not Spam" can work, Seth Goodman, 2004/06/17
- Re: FTC: we need sender authentication before "Do Not Spam" can work, Daniel Taylor, 2004/06/18
- RE: FTC: we need sender authentication before "Do Not Spam" can work, David Brodbeck, 2004/06/18
- Re: FTC: we need sender authentication before "Do Not Spam" can work, Mark Shewmaker, 2004/06/17
- Re: FTC: we need sender authentication before "Do Not Spam" can work, Greg Wooledge, 2004/06/17
- Re: FTC: we need sender authentication before "Do Not Spam" can work, Koen Martens, 2004/06/18
- Re: FTC: we need sender authentication before "Do Not Spam" can work, Paul Howarth, 2004/06/18
- RE: FTC: we need sender authentication before "Do Not Spam" can work, spf, 2004/06/17
- RE: FTC: we need sender authentication before "Do Not Spam" can work, Paul Howarth, 2004/06/16
- RE: FTC: we need sender authentication before "DoNot Spam" can work, Seth Goodman, 2004/06/17
- RE: FTC: we need sender authentication before "DoNot Spam" can work, Paul Howarth, 2004/06/17
- Re: FTC: we need sender authentication before "Do Not Spam" can work, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/06/16
- Re: FTC: we need sender authentication before "Do Not Spam" can work, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/06/17
- Re: FTC: we need sender authentication before "Do Not Spam" can work, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/06/16
- RE: FTC: we need sender authentication before "Do Not Spam" can work, Gary Levell, 2004/06/16
Spf sendmail-milter,
Nigel Kilner,
2004/06/15
- Re: Spf sendmail-milter, Paul Howarth, 2004/06/16
- Re: Spf sendmail-milter, Nigel, 2004/06/16
- Re: Spf sendmail-milter, Paul Howarth, 2004/06/16
- Re: Spf sendmail-milter, Nigel, 2004/06/16
- Re: Spf sendmail-milter, James Couzens, 2004/06/16
- Re: Spf sendmail-milter, Paul Howarth, 2004/06/16
- Re: Spf sendmail-milter, David Brodbeck, 2004/06/16
- Re: Spf sendmail-milter, Nigel, 2004/06/16
- Re: Spf sendmail-milter, Paul Howarth, 2004/06/16
- Re[2]: Spf sendmail-milter, Chris Drake, 2004/06/16
- Re: Spf sendmail-milter, Paul Howarth, 2004/06/16
- Re: Spf sendmail-milter, Nigel, 2004/06/16
- Re: Spf sendmail-milter, Daniel Taylor, 2004/06/16
- Re: Spf sendmail-milter, Daniel Taylor, 2004/06/17
Zafi.b,
administrator,
2004/06/15
- Re: Zafi.b, Lars Dybdahl, 2004/06/15
- Re: Zafi.b, Fridrik Skulason, 2004/06/15
- RE: Zafi.b, spf, 2004/06/15
- Re: Zafi.b, Fridrik Skulason, 2004/06/15
- RE: Zafi.b, spf, 2004/06/15
- Re: Zafi.b, Jeffrey Goldberg, 2004/06/15
- Re: Zafi.b, Koen Martens, 2004/06/15
- Re: Zafi.b, Lars Dybdahl, 2004/06/16
- OT: Hungarian and SPF meanings [was: Zafi.b], Jeffrey Goldberg, 2004/06/15
- Re: Zafi.b, Karl Prince, 2004/06/18
Large address scope problem,
Gary Levell,
2004/06/14
- RE: Large address scope problem, spf, 2004/06/14
- Re: Large address scope problem, Jon Kyme, 2004/06/14
- OT: Obnoxious disclaimer, Paul Iadonisi, 2004/06/14
- Re: Large address scope problem, Jeffrey Goldberg, 2004/06/14
- RE: Large address scope problem, Gary Levell, 2004/06/14
- RE: Large address scope problem, Gary Levell, 2004/06/14
Why is this failing?,
Michael Weiner,
2004/06/13
- Re: Why is this failing?, James Couzens, 2004/06/13
- Please stop publishing -all it is NOT time yet, James Couzens, 2004/06/13
- Not too early. Re: Please stop publishing -all it is NOT time yet, Daniel Taylor, 2004/06/13
- bad advice: Please stop publishing -all it is NOT time yet, wayne, 2004/06/13
- Re: bad advice: Please stop publishing -all it is NOT time yet, Michael Weiner, 2004/06/13
- Re: bad advice: Please stop publishing -all it is NOT time yet, wayne, 2004/06/13
- Re: bad advice: Please stop publishing -all it is NOT time yet, wayne, 2004/06/13
- Re: bad advice: Please stop publishing -all it is NOT time yet, Michael Weiner, 2004/06/13
- Re: bad advice: Please stop publishing -all it is NOT time yet, Michael Weiner, 2004/06/13
- Re: bad advice: Please stop publishing -all it is NOT time yet, wayne, 2004/06/13
- Re: bad advice: Please stop publishing -all it is NOT time yet, Michael Weiner, 2004/06/13
- Re: bad advice: Please stop publishing -all it is NOT time yet, wayne, 2004/06/13
- Re: bad advice: Please stop publishing -all it is NOT time yet, wayne, 2004/06/14
- Re: bad advice: Please stop publishing -all it is NOT time yet, Jeffrey Goldberg, 2004/06/14
- RE: Why is this failing? was: bad advice: Please stop publishing -all it is NOT time yet was: Why is this failing?, spf, 2004/06/15
- Re: bad advice: Please stop publishing -all it is NOT time yet, David Woodhouse, 2004/06/14
- Re: bad advice: Please stop publishing -all it isNOT time yet, Roger Moser, 2004/06/14
- Re: bad advice: Please stop publishing -all it isNOT time yet, David Woodhouse, 2004/06/14
- Re: Please stop publishing -all it is NOT time yet, Teddy, 2004/06/14
- Re: Please stop publishing -all it is NOT time yet, David Woodhouse, 2004/06/14
- Re: Please stop publishing -all it is NOT time yet, Koen Martens, 2004/06/14
- Re: Please stop publishing -all it is NOT time yet, David Woodhouse, 2004/06/14
- Re: Please stop publishing -all it is NOT time yet, Koen Martens, 2004/06/14
- Re: Please stop publishing -all it is NOT time yet, Teddy, 2004/06/14
- Re: Please stop publishing -all it is NOT time yet, David Woodhouse, 2004/06/14
- Re: Please stop publishing -all it is NOT time yet, Teddy, 2004/06/14
- Re: Please stop publishing -all it is NOT time yet, Roger Moser, 2004/06/14
- Re: Please stop publishing -all it is NOT time yet, Teddy, 2004/06/14
- Re: Please stop publishing -all it is NOT time yet, Roger Moser, 2004/06/14
- Re: Please stop publishing -all it is NOT time yet, Teddy, 2004/06/14
- Re: Please stop publishing -all it is NOT time yet, wayne, 2004/06/14
- Re: Please stop publishing -all it is NOT time yet, Daniel Taylor, 2004/06/14
- Re: Please stop publishing -all it is NOT time yet, David Woodhouse, 2004/06/14
- Re: Please stop publishing -all it is NOT time yet, wayne, 2004/06/14
- Re: Please stop publishing -all it is NOT time yet, David Woodhouse, 2004/06/14
- RE: Please stop publishing -all it is NOT time yet, Seth Goodman, 2004/06/14
- Re: Please stop publishing -all it is NOT time yet, Teddy, 2004/06/14
- Re: Please stop publishing -all it is NOT time yet, wayne, 2004/06/14
- Re: Please stop publishing -all it is NOT time yet, Koen Martens, 2004/06/14
- Re: Please stop publishing -all it is NOT time yet, Jeffrey Goldberg, 2004/06/14
- Re: Please stop publishing -all it is NOT time yet, Lars B. Dybdahl, 2004/06/14
- Re: Why is this failing?, wayne, 2004/06/13
GMX,
Ernesto Baschny,
2004/06/13
RE: reputation systems and RHSBLs,
Michel Py,
2004/06/12
- RE: reputation systems and RHSBLs, James Pullicino, 2004/06/13
- RE: reputation systems and RHSBLs, James Couzens, 2004/06/13
- Re: reputation systems and RHSBLs, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/06/13
- RE: reputation systems and RHSBLs, Seth Goodman, 2004/06/13
- RE: reputation systems and RHSBLs, Greg Connor, 2004/06/13
- Re: reputation systems and RHSBLs, Mark C. Langston, 2004/06/13
- RE: reputation systems and RHSBLs, Seth Goodman, 2004/06/14
- Re: reputation systems and RHSBLs, Jon Kyme, 2004/06/14
AOL to ESPs: Comply with SPF, Or Else,
mengwong,
2004/06/09
- Re: AOL to ESPs: Comply with SPF, Or Else, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/06/09
- you are invited to join spf-deployment, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/06/09
- Re: AOL to ESPs: Comply with SPF, Or Else, Jon Kyme, 2004/06/11
- Re: [spf-discuss] AOL to ESPs: Comply with SPF, Or Else, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/06/11
- Re: [Waitman] Re: [spf-discuss] AOL to ESPs: Comply with SPF, Or Else, Waitman C. Gobble, II, 2004/06/11
- Re: AOL to ESPs: Comply with SPF, Or Else, Alan Hodgson, 2004/06/11
- usefulness of postmaster account, Andy Bakun, 2004/06/11
- Re: [spf-discuss] usefulness of postmaster account, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/06/11
- Re: [spf-discuss] AOL to ESPs: Comply with SPF, Or Else, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/06/11
- snowball effect strategy for SPF conversion, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/06/11
- Re: AOL to ESPs: Comply with SPF, Or Else, wayne, 2004/06/11
- Re: AOL to ESPs: Comply with SPF, Or Else, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/06/11
- Re: AOL to ESPs: Comply with SPF, Or Else, Alan Hodgson, 2004/06/11
- RE: AOL to ESPs: Comply with SPF, Or Else, Julian Mehnle, 2004/06/12
- reputation systems and RHSBLs, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/06/12
- Re: reputation systems and RHSBLs, Jon Kyme, 2004/06/12
- RE: RE: AOL to ESPs: Comply with SPF, Or Else, spf, 2004/06/12
- RE: RE: AOL to ESPs: Comply with SPF, Or Else, James Couzens, 2004/06/12
- Re: AOL to ESPs: Comply with SPF, Or Else, Paul Iadonisi, 2004/06/11
- Re: AOL to ESPs: Comply with SPF, Or Else, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/06/11
- RE: AOL to ESPs: Comply with SPF, Or Else, spf, 2004/06/11
- Re: AOL to ESPs: Comply with SPF, Or Else, Lars B. Dybdahl, 2004/06/12
- Re: AOL to ESPs: Comply with SPF, Or Else, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/06/11
- Re: AOL to ESPs: Comply with SPF, Or Else, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/06/11
- Re: AOL to ESPs: Comply with SPF, Or Else, Scott Taylor, 2004/06/11
- Re: AOL to ESPs: Comply with SPF, Or Else, Tim Meadowcroft, 2004/06/12
- Re: AOL to ESPs: Comply with SPF, Or Else, Koen Martens, 2004/06/12
- Re: AOL to ESPs: Comply with SPF, Or Else, Tim Meadowcroft, 2004/06/12
- Re: AOL to ESPs: Comply with SPF, Or Else, Koen Martens, 2004/06/12
- Re: AOL to ESPs: Comply with SPF, Or Else, Priyadi Iman Nurcahyo, 2004/06/12
- Re: Re: AOL to ESPs: Comply with SPF, Or Else, Tim Meadowcroft, 2004/06/12
- Match, mike, 2004/06/12
- Re: Match, Koen Martens, 2004/06/12
- Re: AOL to ESPs: Comply with SPF, Or Else, Priyadi Iman Nurcahyo, 2004/06/12
- Re: AOL to ESPs: Comply with SPF, Or Else, Priyadi Iman Nurcahyo, 2004/06/12
- Re: Re: AOL to ESPs: Comply with SPF, Or Else, Carl Hutzler, 2004/06/12
- Re: Re: AOL to ESPs: Comply with SPF, Or Else, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/06/12
- Re: AOL to ESPs: Comply with SPF, Or Else, Priyadi Iman Nurcahyo, 2004/06/12
- Re: Re: AOL to ESPs: Comply with SPF, Or Else, James Couzens, 2004/06/13
- Re: Re: AOL to ESPs: Comply with SPF, Or Else, Fridrik Skulason, 2004/06/12
- Re: AOL to ESPs: Comply with SPF, Or Else, Lars Dybdahl, 2004/06/12
- Re: AOL to ESPs: Comply with SPF, Or Else, Paul Iadonisi, 2004/06/12
- Re: AOL to ESPs: Comply with SPF, Or Else, Lars B. Dybdahl, 2004/06/13
- Re: AOL to ESPs: Comply with SPF, Or Else, Tim Meadowcroft, 2004/06/12
- RE: AOL to ESPs: Comply with SPF, Or Else, Seth Goodman, 2004/06/13
- Re: AOL to ESPs: Comply with SPF, Or Else, Tim Meadowcroft, 2004/06/14
- Re: AOL to ESPs: Comply with SPF, Or Else, Lars Dybdahl, 2004/06/12
- Re: AOL to ESPs: Comply with SPF, Or Else, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/06/11
- Re: AOL to ESPs: Comply with SPF, Or Else, Jon Kyme, 2004/06/11
- Re: AOL to ESPs: Comply with SPF, Or Else, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/06/11
- Re: AOL to ESPs: Comply with SPF, Or Else - Publicity, Jillk, 2004/06/12
- Re: AOL to ESPs: Comply with SPF, Or Else - Publicity, Greg Connor, 2004/06/13
- Re: [Waitman] Re: AOL to ESPs: Comply with SPF, Or Else - Publicity, Waitman C Gobble II, 2004/06/13
- Re: AOL to ESPs: Comply with SPF, Or Else, Lars B. Dybdahl, 2004/06/12
- Re: AOL to ESPs: Comply with SPF, Or Else, Koen Martens, 2004/06/12
- Re: AOL to ESPs: Comply with SPF, Or Else, Lars Dybdahl, 2004/06/12
- Re: AOL to ESPs: Comply with SPF, Or Else, James Couzens, 2004/06/13
- Re: AOL to ESPs: Comply with SPF, Or Else, Greg Wooledge, 2004/06/12
- Re: AOL to ESPs: Comply with SPF, Or Else, Frank Ellermann, 2004/06/12
- Re: AOL to ESPs: Comply with SPF, Or Else, Jon Kyme, 2004/06/11
- RE: AOL to ESPs: Comply with SPF, Or Else, Michel Py, 2004/06/12
a "never relays" parameter,
Daniel Quinlan,
2004/06/07
- Re: a "never relays" parameter, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/06/08
- Re: a "never relays" parameter, Daniel Quinlan, 2004/06/08
- Re: a "never relays" parameter, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/06/08
- Re: a "never relays" parameter, Daniel Quinlan, 2004/06/09
- RE: a "never relays" parameter, Seth Goodman, 2004/06/09
- Re: a "never relays" parameter, Daniel Quinlan, 2004/06/09
- RE: a "never relays" parameter, spf, 2004/06/09
- Message not available
- Re: a "never relays" parameter, Daniel Quinlan, 2004/06/09
- RE: a "never relays" parameter, spf, 2004/06/09
- Re: a "never relays" parameter, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/06/09
- RE: a "never relays" parameter, Seth Goodman, 2004/06/09
- Re: a "never relays" parameter, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/06/09
- RE: a "never relays" parameter, Seth Goodman, 2004/06/09
- RE: a "never relays" parameter, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/06/09
- Re: a "never relays" parameter, Roger Moser, 2004/06/09
- Re: a "never relays" parameter, wayne, 2004/06/10
- RE: a "never relays" parameter, Seth Goodman, 2004/06/10
- EXP, mike, 2004/06/10
- Re: EXP, spf, 2004/06/10
- Re: EXP, mike, 2004/06/10
- Re: EXP, Angus, 2004/06/10
- RE: a "never relays" parameter, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/06/10
- RE: a "never relays" parameter, Seth Goodman, 2004/06/10
- RE: a "never relays" parameter, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/06/10
- RE: a "never relays" parameter, Seth Goodman, 2004/06/10
- Re: a "never relays" parameter, Graham Murray, 2004/06/10
- RE: a "never relays" parameter, Seth Goodman, 2004/06/10
- Re: a "never relays" parameter, Roger Moser, 2004/06/11
- RE: a "never relays" parameter, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/06/11
- RE: a "never relays" parameter, Seth Goodman, 2004/06/11
- Re: a "never relays" parameter, Roger Moser, 2004/06/11
- Re: a "never relays" parameter, Greg Connor, 2004/06/11
- Re: a "never relays" parameter, Roger Moser, 2004/06/12
- RE: a "never relays" parameter, Seth Goodman, 2004/06/13
- Bootstrapping trust model (was Re: a "never relays" parameter), Greg Connor, 2004/06/13
- RE: Bootstrapping trust model (was Re: a "never relays" parameter), Seth Goodman, 2004/06/14
- Re: Bootstrapping trust model, Frank Ellermann, 2004/06/15
- RE: Re: Bootstrapping trust model, Seth Goodman, 2004/06/15
- RE: a "never relays" parameter, Seth Goodman, 2004/06/13
- Re: a "never relays" parameter, Roger Moser, 2004/06/13
- RE: a "never relays" parameter, Seth Goodman, 2004/06/13
- Re: a "never relays" parameter, Roger Moser, 2004/06/13
- Re: a "never relays" parameter, Roger Moser, 2004/06/14
- Re: a "never relays" parameter, Mark Shewmaker, 2004/06/09
- Re: a "never relays" parameter, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/06/08
- Re: a "never relays" parameter, wayne, 2004/06/08
Re: Postfix and SPF question,
Jim Ramsay,
2004/06/07
- RE: Re: Postfix and SPF question, Eric Girard, 2004/06/07
- RE: Re: Postfix and SPF question, Eric Girard, 2004/06/07
- RE: Re: Postfix and SPF question, Gerhard W. Recher, 2004/06/08
- RE: Re: Postfix and SPF question, Eric Girard, 2004/06/08
- RE: Re: Postfix and SPF question, Gerhard W. Recher, 2004/06/08
- RE: Re: Postfix and SPF question, Eric Girard, 2004/06/08
Forking SPF into The New SPF and SPF1,
Julian Mehnle,
2004/06/07
- Re: Forking SPF into The New SPF and SPF1, Franz J Ehrengruber (iptelenet), 2004/06/07
- Re: Forking SPF into The New SPF and SPF1, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/06/07
- Re: Forking SPF into The New SPF and SPF1, list+spf-discuss, 2004/06/08
- Re: Forking SPF into The New SPF and SPF1, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/06/08
- SPFv1 needs SRS help; also, Internet gazillionaires please donate, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/06/08
- Re: SPFv1 needs SRS help; also, Internet gazillionaires please donate, rgreene(_at_)tclme(_dot_)org, 2004/06/08
- bake sale, fund drive, t-shirts, cafe press, etc, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/06/08
- Re: bake sale, fund drive, t-shirts, cafe press, etc, Jameel Akari, 2004/06/08
- RE: SPFv1 needs SRS help; also, Internet gazillionaires please donate, spf, 2004/06/08
- Re: SPFv1 needs SRS help; also, Internet gazillionaires please donate, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/06/08
- Re: SPFv1 needs SRS help; also, Internet gazillionaires please donate, spf, 2004/06/08
- Re: SPFv1 needs SRS help; also, Internet gazillionaires please donate, Koen Martens, 2004/06/08
- RE: Forking SPF into The New SPF and SPF1, Julian Mehnle, 2004/06/10
- Re: Forking SPF into The New SPF and SPF1, spf, 2004/06/08
- Re: Forking SPF into The New SPF and SPF1, list+spf-discuss, 2004/06/09
- RE: Forking SPF into The New SPF and SPF1, Seth Goodman, 2004/06/09
- RE: Forking SPF into The New SPF and SPF1, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/06/09
- RE: Forking SPF into The New SPF and SPF1, Seth Goodman, 2004/06/09
- RE: Forking SPF into The New SPF and SPF1, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/06/09
- RE: Forking SPF into The New SPF and SPF1, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/06/09
- RE: Forking SPF into The New SPF and SPF1, Julian Mehnle, 2004/06/10
- RE: RE: Forking SPF into The New SPF and SPF1, terry, 2004/06/10
- Forking SPF into The New SPF and SPF1, Julian Mehnle, 2004/06/07
- Re: Forking SPF into The New SPF and SPF1, spf, 2004/06/07
- Re: Forking SPF into The New SPF and SPF1, Teddy, 2004/06/07
- Re: Forking SPF into The New SPF and SPF1, Greg Connor, 2004/06/07
- Re: Forking SPF into The New SPF and SPF1, wayne, 2004/06/07
- Re: Forking SPF into The New SPF and SPF1, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/06/07
- Re: Forking SPF into The New SPF and SPF1, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/06/07
- Re: Forking SPF into The New SPF and SPF1, Billy B. Bilano, 2004/06/07
- Re: Forking SPF into The New SPF and SPF1, Alain Knaff, 2004/06/08
- RE: Forking SPF into The New SPF and SPF1, Ryan Malayter, 2004/06/07
- RE: Forking SPF into The New SPF and SPF1, Michel Py, 2004/06/07
- RE: Forking SPF into The New SPF and SPF1, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/06/07
- Re: Forking SPF into The New SPF and SPF1, Tim Meadowcroft, 2004/06/07
- everybody please calm down :), Meng Weng Wong, 2004/06/07
- Re: everybody please calm down :), Carl Hutzler, 2004/06/07
- RE: everybody please calm down :), Dennis Dayman, 2004/06/07
- RE: everybody please calm down :), Scott Kitterman, 2004/06/07
- RE: everybody please calm down :), terry, 2004/06/07
- RE: everybody please calm down :), Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/06/07
- RE: everybody please calm down :), Scott Taylor, 2004/06/07
- RE: everybody please calm down :), Julian Mehnle, 2004/06/07
- RE: everybody please calm down :), Michael R. Brumm, 2004/06/07
- Re: everybody please calm down :), Frank Ellermann, 2004/06/08
- RE: Forking SPF into The New SPF and SPF1, Michel Py, 2004/06/07
- RE: Forking SPF into The New SPF and SPF1, Michel Py, 2004/06/07
- Re: Forking SPF into The New SPF and SPF1, Theo Van Dinter, 2004/06/07
- Re: Forking SPF into The New SPF and SPF1, Teddy, 2004/06/08
- Re: Forking SPF into The New SPF and SPF1, Karl J. Smith, 2004/06/08
- Re: Forking SPF into The New SPF and SPF1, Teddy, 2004/06/08
- Re: Forking SPF into The New SPF and SPF1, Karl Prince, 2004/06/08
- Re: Forking SPF into The New SPF and SPF1, David Brodbeck, 2004/06/08
- Re: Forking SPF into The New SPF and SPF1, wayne, 2004/06/08
- RE: Forking SPF into The New SPF and SPF1, Ryan Malayter, 2004/06/07
- RE: Forking SPF into The New SPF and SPF1, Michel Py, 2004/06/07
- RE: Forking SPF into The New SPF and SPF1, Michel Py, 2004/06/08
SPF: Not just a clever idea,
Greg Connor,
2004/06/07
- Re: SPF: Not just a clever idea, Teddy, 2004/06/07
- Re: SPF: Not just a clever idea, James Couzens, 2004/06/07
- Re: SPF: Not just a clever idea, Jim Hill, 2004/06/07
- Re: SPF: Not just a clever idea, Karl Prince, 2004/06/07
- Re: SPF: Not just a clever idea, wayne, 2004/06/07
- RE: SPF: Not just a clever idea, Michel Py, 2004/06/07
- RE: RE: SPF: Not just a clever idea, Michel Py, 2004/06/07
- RE: SPF: Not just a clever idea, Michel Py, 2004/06/07
- Re: RE: SPF: Not just a clever idea, administrator, 2004/06/08
- Re: RE: SPF: Not just a clever idea, Mark Shewmaker, 2004/06/08
- RE: RE: SPF: Not just a clever idea, Seth Goodman, 2004/06/08
- RE: RE: SPF: Not just a clever idea, Mark Shewmaker, 2004/06/09
- RE: RE: SPF: Not just a clever idea, Aredridel, 2004/06/09
- Re: RE: SPF: Not just a clever idea, Teddy, 2004/06/09
- XML in DNS, wayne, 2004/06/09
- Re: XML in DNS, wayne, 2004/06/09
- RE: RE: SPF: Not just a clever idea, Seth Goodman, 2004/06/09
- Re: RE: SPF: Not just a clever idea, Graham Murray, 2004/06/09
- RE: RE: SPF: Not just a clever idea, administrator, 2004/06/09
Forwarding Methods Available with SPF,
Michael R. Brumm,
2004/06/06
- Re: Forwarding Methods Available with SPF, Frank Ellermann, 2004/06/06
- Re: Forwarding Methods Available with SPF, Aredridel, 2004/06/06
- Re: Forwarding Methods Available with SPF, James Couzens, 2004/06/06
- RE: Forwarding Methods Available with SPF, Seth Goodman, 2004/06/06
- Re: Forwarding Methods Available with SPF, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/06/06
- Re: Forwarding Methods Available with SPF, Greg Connor, 2004/06/06
- Re: Forwarding Methods Available with SPF., David Nicol, 2004/06/07
Dear Microsoft,,
James Couzens,
2004/06/06
- Re: Dear Microsoft,, wayne, 2004/06/06
- Re: Dear Microsoft,, James Couzens, 2004/06/06
- Re: Dear Microsoft,, wayne, 2004/06/06
- Re: Dear Microsoft,, James Couzens, 2004/06/06
- Re: Dear Microsoft,, wayne, 2004/06/06
- Re: Dear Microsoft,, James Couzens, 2004/06/06
- RE: Dear Microsoft,, Michael R. Brumm, 2004/06/06
- Re[2]: Dear Microsoft,, Chris Drake, 2004/06/06
- Re: Dear Microsoft,, wayne, 2004/06/06
- phishing & MS MUAs, Chris Drake, 2004/06/06
- Re: phishing & MS MUAs, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/06/06
- RE: phishing & MS MUAs, Vivien M., 2004/06/06
- Re[2]: phishing & MS MUAs, Chris Drake, 2004/06/07
- RE: Re[2]: phishing & MS MUAs, Scott Kitterman, 2004/06/07
- Re: phishing & MS MUAs, Shevek, 2004/06/07
- Re: Dear Microsoft,, James Couzens, 2004/06/07
- Re: Dear Microsoft,, Angus, 2004/06/07
- Re: Dear Microsoft,, James Couzens, 2004/06/07
- Off-topic: pgp, spf, 2004/06/07
- Re: Off-topic: pgp, Jon Kyme, 2004/06/07
- Re: Dear Microsoft,, Greg Wooledge, 2004/06/07
- Re: Dear Microsoft,, list+spf-discuss, 2004/06/07
- Re: Dear Microsoft,, Greg Connor, 2004/06/06
- Re: Dear Microsoft,, James Couzens, 2004/06/06
- Re: Dear Microsoft,, Greg Connor, 2004/06/06
- Re: Dear Microsoft,, James Couzens, 2004/06/06
- Re: Dear Microsoft,, Scott Taylor, 2004/06/06
- Re: Dear Microsoft,, Greg Connor, 2004/06/06
- Re: Dear Microsoft,, Teddy, 2004/06/07
- Re: Dear Microsoft,, Ernesto Baschny, 2004/06/07
- Re: Dear Microsoft,, Paul Howarth, 2004/06/07
- Re: Dear Microsoft,, Gerhard W. Recher, 2004/06/07
- Re: Dear Microsoft,, Karl Prince, 2004/06/07
- Re: Dear Microsoft,, James Couzens, 2004/06/07
- Re: Dear Microsoft,, wayne, 2004/06/07
- Re: Dear Microsoft,, Karl Prince, 2004/06/07
- Re: Dear Microsoft,, Greg Connor, 2004/06/07
- Re: Dear Microsoft,, Teddy, 2004/06/07
- Re: Dear Microsoft,, Karl Prince, 2004/06/07
- Re: Dear Microsoft,, Teddy, 2004/06/07
- Re: Dear Microsoft,, Steven Earl Smith, 2004/06/15
ENVID to prevent forged bounces with SUBMITTER?,
Michael R. Brumm,
2004/06/05
- Re: ENVID to prevent forged bounces with SUBMITTER?, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/06/05
- Re: ENVID to prevent forged bounces with SUBMITTER?, Mark, 2004/06/05
- RE: ENVID to prevent forged bounces with SUBMITTER?, Michael R. Brumm, 2004/06/05
- Re: ENVID to prevent forged bounces with SUBMITTER?, Daniel Taylor, 2004/06/05
- RE: ENVID to prevent forged bounces with SUBMITTER?, Michael R. Brumm, 2004/06/05
- Re: ENVID to prevent forged bounces with SUBMITTER?, Daniel Taylor, 2004/06/05
- RE: ENVID to prevent forged bounces with SUBMITTER?, Seth Goodman, 2004/06/06
- RE: ENVID to prevent forged bounces with SUBMITTER?, Shevek, 2004/06/06
- RE: ENVID to prevent forged bounces with SUBMITTER?, Seth Goodman, 2004/06/06
- RE: ENVID to prevent forged bounces with SUBMITTER?, Shevek, 2004/06/06
- RE: ENVID to prevent forged bounces with SUBMITTER?, Seth Goodman, 2004/06/06
- SES - what exactly is it and what is it supposed to do?, Shevek, 2004/06/06
- RE: SES - what exactly is it and what is it supposed to do?, Seth Goodman, 2004/06/06
- RE: ENVID to prevent forged bounces with SUBMITTER?, Seth Goodman, 2004/06/05
- RE: ENVID to prevent forged bounces with SUBMITTER?, George Mitchell, 2004/06/05
- RE: ENVID to prevent forged bounces with SUBMITTER?, Michael R. Brumm, 2004/06/05
- RE: ENVID to prevent forged bounces with SUBMITTER?, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/06/05
- Standard for SES (signed envelope sender), Roger Moser, 2004/06/05
- Re: Standard for SES (signed envelope sender), Shevek, 2004/06/06
- Re: Standard for SES (signed envelope sender), Roger Moser, 2004/06/06
- Re: Standard for SES (signed envelope sender), Shevek, 2004/06/06
- RE: ENVID to prevent forged bounces with SUBMITTER?, Seth Goodman, 2004/06/06
- RE: ENVID to prevent forged bounces with SUBMITTER?, Shevek, 2004/06/06
- RE: ENVID to prevent forged bounces with SUBMITTER?, Seth Goodman, 2004/06/06
- Unnecessary complication in SES - what does it really do?, Shevek, 2004/06/06
- RE: Unnecessary complication in SES - what does it really do?, Seth Goodman, 2004/06/06
- RE: Unnecessary complication in SES - what does it really do?, Shevek, 2004/06/06
- RE: Unnecessary complication in SES - what does it really do?, Seth Goodman, 2004/06/06
- Re: ENVID to prevent forged bounces with SUBMITTER?, Mark Shewmaker, 2004/06/05
Question on how things work,
Dave Lewis,
2004/06/04
- Re: Question on how things work, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/06/04
- Re: Question on how things work, Dave Lewis, 2004/06/04
- Re: Question on how things work, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/06/04
- Re: Question on how things work, Dave Lewis, 2004/06/04
- Re: Question on how things work, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/06/04
- Re: Question on how things work, James Couzens, 2004/06/04
- Attn: James Couzens, Chris Drake, 2004/06/19
- Re: Question on how things work, Paul Howarth, 2004/06/04
- Re: Question on how things work, Weldon Whipple, 2004/06/04
- Re: Question on how things work, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/06/04
- Re: Question on how things work, Weldon Whipple, 2004/06/04
- Re: Question on how things work, Weldon Whipple, 2004/06/06
- Re: Question on how things work, wayne, 2004/06/09
- RE: Question on how things work, Seth Goodman, 2004/06/09
- Re: Question on how things work, wayne, 2004/06/09
- RE: Question on how things work, Seth Goodman, 2004/06/10
- Re: Question on how things work, Weldon Whipple, 2004/06/10
- Re: Question on how things work, Paul Howarth, 2004/06/10
- Re: Question on how things work, Weldon Whipple, 2004/06/10
- Re: Question on how things work, John Capo, 2004/06/04
SUBMITTER is a bad idea,
spf,
2004/06/03
- Re: SUBMITTER is a bad idea, Greg Connor, 2004/06/03
- RE: SUBMITTER is a bad idea, Michael R. Brumm, 2004/06/03
- RE: SUBMITTER is a bad idea, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/06/03
- RE: SUBMITTER is a bad idea, Seth Goodman, 2004/06/04
- RE: SUBMITTER is a bad idea, Michael R. Brumm, 2004/06/04
- Re: SUBMITTER is a bad idea, Roger Moser, 2004/06/04
- Re: SUBMITTER is a bad idea, Shevek, 2004/06/04
- RE: SUBMITTER is a bad idea, Michael R. Brumm, 2004/06/04
- RE: SUBMITTER is a bad idea, Seth Goodman, 2004/06/04
- Re: SUBMITTER is a bad idea, Roger Moser, 2004/06/04
- Re: SUBMITTER is a bad idea, Shevek, 2004/06/05
- RE: SUBMITTER is a bad idea, Seth Goodman, 2004/06/04
- Re: SUBMITTER is a bad idea, Frank Ellermann, 2004/06/05
- Re: Re: SUBMITTER is a bad idea, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/06/05
- Re: SUBMITTER is a bad idea, Frank Ellermann, 2004/06/05
- Re: Re: SUBMITTER is a bad idea, Aredridel, 2004/06/05
- ebay problem, hostmaster, 2004/06/05
- Re: ebay problem, wayne, 2004/06/05
- Re: ebay problem, Angus, 2004/06/05
- Re: ebay problem, hostmaster, 2004/06/05
- Re: ebay problem, Aredridel, 2004/06/05
- RE: ebay problem, Michael R. Brumm, 2004/06/05
- RE: ebay problem, Gerhard W. Recher, 2004/06/05
- Message not available
- Re: ebay problem, Angus, 2004/06/05
- Re: ebay problem, Gerhard W. Recher, 2004/06/05
- Re[2]: ebay problem, Chris Drake, 2004/06/05
- Re: ebay problem, wayne, 2004/06/05
- Re: ebay problem, Carl Hutzler, 2004/06/06
- RE: ebay problem, George Young1, 2004/06/06
- Re: ebay problem, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/06/07
- Re: ebay problem, Chuck Mead, 2004/06/07
- Re: ebay problem, wayne, 2004/06/07
- Re: ebay problem, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/06/07
- Re: ebay problem, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/06/07
- RE: ebay problem, Michael R. Brumm, 2004/06/07
- Re: ebay problem, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/06/07
- RE: ebay problem, Michael R. Brumm, 2004/06/07
- using trusted-forwarder.org, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/06/07
- Re: SUBMITTER is a bad idea, Frank Ellermann, 2004/06/05
- RE: Re: SUBMITTER is a bad idea, Seth Goodman, 2004/06/05
- Re: SUBMITTER is a bad idea, Frank Ellermann, 2004/06/05
- RE: Re: SUBMITTER is a bad idea, Seth Goodman, 2004/06/06
- Re: SUBMITTER is a bad idea, Frank Ellermann, 2004/06/06
- Re: Re: SUBMITTER is a bad idea, list+spf-discuss, 2004/06/07
- RE: Re: SUBMITTER is a bad idea, Michael R. Brumm, 2004/06/06
- RE: Re: SUBMITTER is a bad idea, Shevek, 2004/06/06
- RE: Re: SUBMITTER is a bad idea, Seth Goodman, 2004/06/06
- Re: Re: SUBMITTER is a bad idea, Cory Wagner, 2004/06/05
- Re: Re: SUBMITTER is a bad idea, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/06/05
- Re: SUBMITTER is a bad idea, Roger Moser, 2004/06/04
- RE: SUBMITTER is a bad idea, Shevek, 2004/06/04
- RE: SUBMITTER is a bad idea, Seth Goodman, 2004/06/04
A hole in planned phishing-prevention?,
Ryan Malayter,
2004/06/03
- Re: A hole in planned phishing-prevention?, Dustin D. Trammell, 2004/06/03
- Re: A hole in planned phishing-prevention?, Shevek, 2004/06/03
- RE: A hole in planned phishing-prevention?, Seth Goodman, 2004/06/03
- RE: A hole in planned phishing-prevention?, Tony Finch, 2004/06/14
- RE: A hole in planned phishing-prevention?, Seth Goodman, 2004/06/14
- Re: A hole in planned phishing-prevention?, Alan Hodgson, 2004/06/14
- RE: A hole in planned phishing-prevention?, Seth Goodman, 2004/06/14
- RE: A hole in planned phishing-prevention?, Tony Finch, 2004/06/14
- RE: A hole in planned phishing-prevention?, Seth Goodman, 2004/06/14
- RE: A hole in planned phishing-prevention?, Tony Finch, 2004/06/14
- RE: A hole in planned phishing-prevention?, Seth Goodman, 2004/06/17
- RE: A hole in planned phishing-prevention?, Tony Finch, 2004/06/17
- RE: A hole in planned phishing-prevention?, Seth Goodman, 2004/06/17
- Re: A hole in planned phishing-prevention?, Jeffrey Goldberg, 2004/06/18
- Re: A hole in planned phishing-prevention?, Greg Connor, 2004/06/03
- Re: A hole in planned phishing-prevention?, Daniel Quinlan, 2004/06/03
- Re: A hole in planned phishing-prevention?, David Brodbeck, 2004/06/03
- Re: A hole in planned phishing-prevention?, Andy Bakun, 2004/06/03
- Re: A hole in planned phishing-prevention?, Daniel Quinlan, 2004/06/03
- Re: A hole in planned phishing-prevention?, Graham Murray, 2004/06/04
- Re: [Waitman] Re: A hole in planned phishing-prevention?, Waitman C. Gobble, II, 2004/06/04
- Re: A hole in planned phishing-prevention?, Andy Bakun, 2004/06/04
- Re: A hole in planned phishing-prevention?, Daniel Quinlan, 2004/06/04
- Re: A hole in planned phishing-prevention?, william(at)elan.net, 2004/06/04
- Re: A hole in planned phishing-prevention?, william(at)elan.net, 2004/06/04
- Re: A hole in planned phishing-prevention?, Andy Bakun, 2004/06/04
- Re: A hole in planned phishing-prevention?, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/06/05
- Re: A hole in planned phishing-prevention?, Shevek, 2004/06/05
- Re: A hole in planned phishing-prevention?, Andy Bakun, 2004/06/05
- Re: A hole in planned phishing-prevention?, Daniel Taylor, 2004/06/05
- Re: A hole in planned phishing-prevention?, Shevek, 2004/06/06
- Re: A hole in planned phishing-prevention?, Daniel Taylor, 2004/06/06
- Re: A hole in planned phishing-prevention?, Shevek, 2004/06/03
- Re: A hole in planned phishing-prevention?, Mark Shewmaker, 2004/06/03
- RE: A hole in planned phishing-prevention?, Michel Py, 2004/06/03
- RE: A hole in planned phishing-prevention?, Ryan Malayter, 2004/06/04
- RE: A hole in planned phishing-prevention?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/06/04
- RE: A hole in planned phishing-prevention?, Michel Py, 2004/06/04
- RE: A hole in planned phishing-prevention?, Michel Py, 2004/06/04
dynamic DNS and SPF?,
Lotas Smartman,
2004/06/03
- RE: dynamic DNS and SPF?, terry, 2004/06/03
- RE: dynamic DNS and SPF?, Michael R. Brumm, 2004/06/03
- Re: dynamic DNS and SPF?, Lotas Smartman, 2004/06/03
- RE: dynamic DNS and SPF?, Michael R. Brumm, 2004/06/03
- Re: dynamic DNS and SPF?, Paul Howarth, 2004/06/03
- Re: dynamic DNS and SPF?, Lotas Smartman, 2004/06/03
- Re: dynamic DNS and SPF?, Franz J Ehrengruber (iptelenet), 2004/06/03
- Re: dynamic DNS and SPF?, Paul Howarth, 2004/06/03
- Re: dynamic DNS and SPF?, Lotas Smartman, 2004/06/03
- RE: dynamic DNS and SPF?, Michael R. Brumm, 2004/06/03
- Re: dynamic DNS and SPF?, Lotas Smartman, 2004/06/04
- Re: dynamic DNS and SPF?, Paul Howarth, 2004/06/04
- RE: dynamic DNS and SPF?, Michael R. Brumm, 2004/06/04
- Re: dynamic DNS and SPF?, Paul Howarth, 2004/06/04
- Re: dynamic DNS and SPF?, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/06/04
- Re: dynamic DNS and SPF?, Lotas Smartman, 2004/06/04
- short-term ISP policies, Koen Martens, 2004/06/04
- Re: short-term ISP policies, David Brodbeck, 2004/06/04
- Re: short-term ISP policies, Paul Howarth, 2004/06/05
- Re: short-term ISP policies, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/06/05
- get your ISP to do spf, Koen Martens, 2004/06/04
- Re: get your ISP to do spf, James Couzens, 2004/06/04
- Re: dynamic DNS and SPF?, Peter Bowyer, 2004/06/04
- Re: dynamic DNS and SPF?, Lotas Smartman, 2004/06/04
- Re: dynamic DNS and SPF?, Peter Bowyer, 2004/06/04
- Re: dynamic DNS and SPF?, Lotas Smartman, 2004/06/04
- Re: dynamic DNS and SPF?, David Brodbeck, 2004/06/04
- Re: dynamic DNS and SPF?, Paul Howarth, 2004/06/04
- Re: dynamic DNS and SPF?, James Couzens, 2004/06/04
- RE: dynamic DNS and SPF?, Scott Kitterman, 2004/06/04
- RE: dynamic DNS and SPF?, James Couzens, 2004/06/04
- RE: dynamic DNS and SPF?, Seth Goodman, 2004/06/04
- Re: dynamic DNS and SPF?, Frank Ellermann, 2004/06/05
- RE: dynamic DNS and SPF?, administrator, 2004/06/05
DNS & XML,
administrator,
2004/06/02
- Is AOL using SPF on all its servers? I think not, George Young1, 2004/06/02
- Re: Is AOL using SPF on all its servers? I think not, wayne, 2004/06/02
- Re: Is AOL using SPF on all its servers? I think not, Carl Hutzler, 2004/06/02
- Re: Is AOL using SPF on all its servers?, Dean Gibson (Mail Administrator), 2004/06/02
- Re: Is AOL using SPF on all its servers? I think not, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/06/02
- Some kind of AOL authentication is going on?, George Young1, 2004/06/02
- Re: Some kind of AOL authentication is going on?, Michael Weiner, 2004/06/02
- Re: Some kind of AOL authentication is going on?, Greg Connor, 2004/06/02
- Re: Some kind of AOL authentication is going on?, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/06/02
- Re: Is AOL using SPF on all its servers? I think not, Chuck Mead, 2004/06/02
- Re: Is AOL using SPF on all its servers? I think not, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/06/02
- Re: Is AOL using SPF on all its servers? I think not, Chuck Mead, 2004/06/02
- Re: DNS & XML, James Couzens, 2004/06/04
Re: THIS POLL IS USELESS,
list+spf-discuss,
2004/06/01
- Re: THIS POLL IS USELESS, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/06/01
- exists as the basis for all directives, Andy Bakun, 2004/06/01
- Sender Permitted From vs Sender Policy Framework, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/06/02
- Re: Sender Permitted From vs Sender Policy Framework, william(at)elan.net, 2004/06/02
- Re: Sender Permitted From vs Sender Policy Framework, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/06/02
- Sender Permitted From vs Sender Policy Framework, George Young1, 2004/06/02
- RE: Sender Permitted From vs Sender Policy Framework, Seth Goodman, 2004/06/02
- RE: Domain Keys vs Sender Permitted From vs Sender Policy Framework, william(at)elan.net, 2004/06/02
- RE: Domain Keys vs Sender Permitted From vs Sender Policy Framework, Seth Goodman, 2004/06/02
- RE: Domain Keys vs Sender Permitted From vs Sender Policy Framework, Mark Shewmaker, 2004/06/03
- RE: Domain Keys vs Sender Permitted From vs SenderPolicy Framework, Seth Goodman, 2004/06/03
- RE: Domain Keys vs Sender Permitted From vs SenderPolicy Framework, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/06/03
- RE: Domain Keys vs Sender Permitted From vs SenderPolicy Framework, Seth Goodman, 2004/06/03
- RE: Domain Keys vs Sender Permitted From vs SenderPolicy Framework, Mark Shewmaker, 2004/06/04
- RE: Domain Keys vs Sender Permitted From vsSenderPolicy Framework, Seth Goodman, 2004/06/04
- RE: Domain Keys vs Sender Permitted From vsSenderPolicy Framework, Mark Shewmaker, 2004/06/04
- RE: Domain Keys vs Sender Permitted From vs Sender Policy Framework, Dustin D. Trammell, 2004/06/03
- RE: Domain Keys vs Sender Permitted From vs Sender Policy Framework, william(at)elan.net, 2004/06/03
- Re: Domain Keys vs Sender Permitted From vs Sender Policy Framework, David McNett, 2004/06/03
Re: Re[2]: RCPT TO: rejecting (OT),
David Brodbeck,
2004/06/01
- Re: RCPT TO: rejecting (OT), Daniel Taylor, 2004/06/01
- Re: RCPT TO: rejecting (OT), David Brodbeck, 2004/06/01
- Re: RCPT TO: rejecting (OT), Peter Bowyer, 2004/06/01
- Re: RCPT TO: rejecting (OT), David Brodbeck, 2004/06/01
- Re: RCPT TO: rejecting (OT), Jeffrey Goldberg, 2004/06/01
- Re: RCPT TO: rejecting (OT), Adrian Barker, 2004/06/03
- Re: RCPT TO: rejecting (OT), David Brodbeck, 2004/06/03
- Re: RCPT TO: rejecting (OT), Peter Bowyer, 2004/06/01
Re: XML Poll (Please respond only once),
Guillaume Filion,
2004/06/01
- Re: XML Poll (Please respond only once), wayne, 2004/06/01
- Re: XML Poll (Please respond only once), Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/06/01
- Re: XML Poll (Please respond only once), spf, 2004/06/01
- Re: XML Poll (Please respond only once), James Couzens, 2004/06/01
- RE: XML Poll (Please respond only once), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/06/01
- was: XML Poll, Frank Ellermann, 2004/06/01
- Re: was: XML Poll, dave wanta, 2004/06/01
- Re: was: XML Poll, Andy Bakun, 2004/06/01
- Re: was: XML Poll, Frank Ellermann, 2004/06/01
- XML typing was: Re: was: XML Poll, Jon Kyme, 2004/06/02
- Re: XML typing, Frank Ellermann, 2004/06/02
- Re: XML typing, Jon Kyme, 2004/06/02
- Re: XML typing, Frank Ellermann, 2004/06/02
- Re: XML typing, Jon Kyme, 2004/06/02
- Re: Re: was: XML Poll, Peter Bowyer, 2004/06/02
- RE: XML Poll (Please respond only once), Daniel Taylor, 2004/06/02
- Re: XML Poll (Please respond only once), Lou Katz, 2004/06/02
- Re: XML Poll (Please respond only once), Karl Prince, 2004/06/07
- Re: XML Poll (Please respond only once), Mark Shewmaker, 2004/06/02
- RE: XML Poll (Please respond only once), terry, 2004/06/07
XML!! Lets bang square peg into round hole!!,
James Couzens,
2004/05/31
- Re: XML!! Lets bang square peg into round hole!!, rgreene(_at_)tclme(_dot_)org, 2004/06/01
- Re[2]: XML!! Lets bang square peg into round hole!!, Chris Drake, 2004/06/01
- Re: XML!! Lets bang square peg into round hole!!, Jeremy T. Bouse, 2004/06/01
- Re: XML!! Lets bang square peg into round hole!!, Guillaume Filion, 2004/06/01
- Re: XML!! Lets bang square peg into round hole!!, Lars B. Dybdahl, 2004/06/01
- Re: XML!! Lets bang square peg into round hole!!, wayne, 2004/06/01
- Re: XML!! Lets bang square peg into round hole!!, Lars B. Dybdahl, 2004/06/01
- Re: XML!! Lets bang square peg into round hole!!, Guillaume Filion, 2004/06/01
- Re: XML!! Lets bang square peg into round hole!!, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/06/01
- Re: XML!! Lets bang square peg into round hole!!, James Couzens, 2004/06/01
- Re: XML!! Lets bang square peg into round hole!!, James Couzens, 2004/06/01
- XML - why you only need pay for it if you use it, Tim Meadowcroft, 2004/06/01
- Re: XML!! Lets bang square peg into round hole!!, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/06/01
- Re: XML!! Lets bang square peg into round hole!!, David Nicol, 2004/06/01
- Re: XML!! Lets bang square peg into round hole!!, administrator, 2004/06/01