spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Re: Why XML

2004-06-23 05:43:22
Tim Meadowcroft:> 
If there was a definition of reasonable subsets of XML to drop all the
extended stuff, I'd sort of agree, but AFAIK if you're going to do XML
you have to the whole thing

Is it the case that a SPF-NG kind of thing would have to be a *validating*
xml processor? But if that is required, is it certain that the spec would
*require* resolution of external entities (or xi:includes)? And if the spec
did require it, how are the Internet police going to make sure that you
poke holes in your firewall and actually do it? Is the UN going to abolish
local policy?


 
 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>