On Wed, 2004-06-23 at 09:39, Lars B. Dybdahl wrote:
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 23:05:48 +0100, Tim Meadowcroft wrote
It sounds like if SPF is going to use XML, there needs to be defined an
XML subset that all records have to adhere to. But of course, then it's
not really XML anymore.
XML with SPF is about marketing - and a subset of XML is good enough for
the marketing purposes.
I'm confused about who it needs to be marketed to. SPF marketing seemed
to be doing just fine and it doesn't contain the "XML" buzzword.