In <1086550800(_dot_)16257(_dot_)551(_dot_)camel(_at_)code3> James Couzens
<jcouzens(_at_)6o4(_dot_)ca> writes:
On Sun, 2004-06-06 at 12:11, wayne wrote:
MicroSoft has lived up to the bargain that they made with the Meng
(and, as Jim Lyon of MS says "his hanger ons").
Please do not direct your anger at MicroSoft. They are blameless in
this situation.
Don't you think that they would look more committed by publishing?
No! They would be violating the New SPF system and would create
confusion!
The very reason they are working with us because they know
it too.
MS working with "us"? MS isn't working with "us" hanger-ons, if they
were, they would be posting here. MS is working with Meng because it
is very useful for them to get the positive press that they are
working with the open-source/internet community and this lets them use
the tens of thousands of published SPF records.
I can't believe that MS publishing SPF1 records was not a stipulation of
this "merger" agreement.
It wasn't. Didn't you get the memo?
-wayne