Re: Dear Microsoft,

On Sun, 2004-06-06 at 13:19, Greg Connor wrote:

> By this you mean which?
>
> 1. "I do not believe there was a merger agreement.  Instead I believe Meng 
> was lying."
>
> 2. "I believe there was a merger agreement, but that Meng actually got MS 
> to agree to publish using SPF1.  I believe that they haven't done as agreed 
> and also that Meng lied about it later."
>
> 3. "I trusted Meng to NOT make such an agreement, as would allow a merger 
> and not require MS to publish our records.  I feel Meng let me down. 
> Instead of saying so in those words, I will use the somewhat misleading 
> phrase 'I can't believe X' about the agreement, to show my disappointment, 
> because couching it in those terms allows me to express my feelings without 
> owning up to my personal choice to feel that way."
4. "I can't believe that MS publishing SPF1 records was not a
stipulation of this "merger" agreement."

Cheers,

James

-- 
James Couzens,
Programmer
-----------------------------------------------------------------
http://libspf.org -- ANSI C Sender Policy Framework library
http://libsrs.org -- ANSI C Sender Rewriting Scheme library
-----------------------------------------------------------------
PGP: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBD3BF855

-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part