"Stuart D. Gathman" <stuart(_at_)bmsi(_dot_)com> writes:
The current macros cover all information available before DATA.
Additional macros may be required to take advantage of proposals to
copy certain 2822 fields to 2821 ESMTP parameters. In that case, yes,
you have the same problem unless there is a 'N/A' behaviour for
unrecognized macros. (Currently an unrecognized macro must generate
ERROR.)
So, let's say you can add some 2822 fields into macros. How, then,
would you implement my proposal with exists?
Daniel
--
Daniel Quinlan
http://www.pathname.com/~quinlan/