In <1087135974(_dot_)3488(_dot_)54(_dot_)camel(_at_)nomad> Michael Weiner
<hunter(_at_)userfriendly(_dot_)net> writes:
Here is my current spf1 record:
userfriendly.net. 86400 IN TXT "v=spf1 mx a:sunshine.
userfriendly.net a:nomad.userfriendly.net a:niteowl.userfriendly.net a:
moonbeam.userfriendly.net ip4:68.22.33.177/32 ip4:68.22.33.178/32
ip4:68.22.33.179/32 ip4:68.22.33.180/32 ip4:68.22.33.181/32
ip4:68.22.33.182/32 -all"
As James pointed out, you also had the record:
userfriendly.net. 86238 IN TXT "The UserFriendly Network"
Now, my partner received an email with the following headers:
Return-Path: <partners(_at_)userfriendly(_dot_)net>
Received: from PC31 ([218.38.114.41])by niteowl.userfriendly.net
(8.12.10/8.12.10 Public port 25! WARNING... abuse, unauthorized access,
or spam sent to this host constitutes acceptance of civil and or
criminal liability by the sender! You have been warned. No UCE!) with
SMTP id i5D7vIbF000529 for <partners(_at_)userfriendly(_dot_)net>; Sun, 13
Jun 2004
03:57:20 -0400
[...]
Received-SPF: unknown (niteowl: error in processing during lookup of
partners(_at_)userfriendly(_dot_)net)
I checked this with the perl Mail::SPF::Query, libspf and libspf-alt
implementations and they all passed. Could you please let me know
which SPF implementation you are using?
-wayne