In <1087150040(_dot_)3488(_dot_)143(_dot_)camel(_at_)nomad> Michael Weiner
<hunter(_at_)userfriendly(_dot_)net> writes:
On Sun, 2004-06-13 at 12:59 -0500, wayne wrote:
I checked this with the perl Mail::SPF::Query, libspf and libspf-alt
implementations and they all passed. Could you please let me know
which SPF implementation you are using?
BTW, i removed the offending TXT record, which i had in DNS for YEARS.
Yeah, I noticed. You shouldn't have had to do that, and as per my
other post, it might not have even been the cause of the problem. Any
SPF implementation that can't deal with other TXT records is going to
have a problem with a *lot* more domains than just UF.
-wayne