one of the things in their terms and conditions is no servers, so some
how i dont think they will like that idea!
On Fri, 4 Jun 2004 15:50:46 -0400, Meng Weng Wong
<mengwong(_at_)dumbo(_dot_)pobox(_dot_)com> wrote:
On Fri, Jun 04, 2004 at 10:23:07AM +0100, Paul Howarth wrote:
|
| "v=spfv1 redirect=customer.ntl.com"
|
| They would then maintain the SPF TXT record for customer.ntl.com with an up
| to date list of the IP addresses of their outgoing mail servers, which may
| not be the same as the IP addresses that they accept submissions from
| customers on (i.e. the addresses corresponding to the name smtp.ntl.com or
| whatever).
Yeah, it's really best to bug your ISP to publish records so
you can do an include: to them.
The more they get bugged to do it, the more likely they are
to actually do it.
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com